Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Nik-Ahd, F; Howard, LE; Aronson, WJ; Terris, MK; Klaassen, Z; Cooperberg, MR; Amling, CL; Kane, CJ; Freedland, SJ
Published in: International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
October 2020

To evaluate the association between obesity and positive surgical margins in patients undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.We retrospectively reviewed the data of 3141 men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy and 1625 undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy between 1988 and 2017 at eight Veterans Health Administration hospitals. The positive surgical margin location (peripheral, apical, bladder neck, overall) was determined from pathology reports. We adjusted for age, race, prostate-specific antigen, surgery year, prostate weight, pathological grade group, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, hospital surgical volume and surgical method (in analyses not stratified by surgical method). Interactions between body mass index and surgical approach were tested.Among all patients, higher body mass index was associated with increased odds of overall, peripheral and apical positive surgical margins (OR 1.02-1.03, P ≤ 0.02). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend between higher body mass index and increased odds of bladder neck positive surgical margins (OR 1.03, P = 0.09). Interactions between body mass index and surgical method were significant for peripheral positive surgical margins only (P = 0.024). Specifically, there was an association between body mass index and peripheral positive surgical margins among men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy (OR 1.04, P < 0.001), but not robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (OR 1.00, P = 0.98). Limitations include lacking individual surgeon data and lacking central pathology review.In this multicenter cohort, higher body mass index was associated with increased odds of positive surgical margins at all locations except the bladder neck. Furthermore, there was a significant association between obesity and peripheral positive surgical margins in men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy, but not robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Long-term clinical significance requires further study.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association

DOI

EISSN

1442-2042

ISSN

0919-8172

Publication Date

October 2020

Volume

27

Issue

10

Start / End Page

851 / 857

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Seminal Vesicles
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Obesity
  • Margins of Excision
  • Male
  • Laparoscopy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nik-Ahd, F., Howard, L. E., Aronson, W. J., Terris, M. K., Klaassen, Z., Cooperberg, M. R., … Freedland, S. J. (2020). Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH. International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 27(10), 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14307
Nik-Ahd, Farnoosh, Lauren E. Howard, William J. Aronson, Martha K. Terris, Zachary Klaassen, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Christopher L. Amling, Christopher J. Kane, and Stephen J. Freedland. “Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH.International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association 27, no. 10 (October 2020): 851–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14307.
Nik-Ahd F, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Klaassen Z, Cooperberg MR, et al. Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2020 Oct;27(10):851–7.
Nik-Ahd, Farnoosh, et al. “Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH.International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association, vol. 27, no. 10, Oct. 2020, pp. 851–57. Epmc, doi:10.1111/iju.14307.
Nik-Ahd F, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Klaassen Z, Cooperberg MR, Amling CL, Kane CJ, Freedland SJ. Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2020 Oct;27(10):851–857.
Journal cover image

Published In

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association

DOI

EISSN

1442-2042

ISSN

0919-8172

Publication Date

October 2020

Volume

27

Issue

10

Start / End Page

851 / 857

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Seminal Vesicles
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Obesity
  • Margins of Excision
  • Male
  • Laparoscopy