Skip to main content

Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pursnani, A; Taron, J; Mayrhofer, T; Lu, MT; Ferencik, M; Ladapo, JA; Douglas, PS; Hoffmann, U
Published in: J Clin Med
September 24, 2020

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for preventive statin treatment in patients with stable chest pain may be difficult as symptoms can be unspecific. It is unclear if coronary CT angiography (CTA)-detected coronary artery disease (CAD) can optimize statin prescription. METHODS: In stable chest pain patients randomized to CTA in the PROMISE trial, statin eligibility was defined per 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina over 26 months median follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) of non-obstructive (1-69% stenosis) and obstructive (≥70% stenosis) CAD for events were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. Calculated HR were then incorporated into the ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation (PCE) to revised ASCVD risk and assess re-classification of statin eligibility. RESULTS: Among 3986 patients (60.5 ± 8.2 years; 51% female), 72.9% (2904/3986) were statin eligible. Event rates in statin-eligible vs. ineligible patients were 3.3% vs. 2.3% (HR = 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.2), p = 0.142). Although the proportion of statin-eligible patients increased with CAD severity, 54% without CAD were statin eligible. Incorporating information on CAD into PCE reclassified 12.7% of patients (1.3% towards statin, 11.4% towards no statin). Similar results were found in stratified analysis of statin naïve patients (reclassification of 13.9%, 1.0% towards statin, and 12.9% towards no statin). As a result, revised ASCVD risk improved model discrimination in all patients (c-statistic: 0.59 (95 %CI 0.55-0.62) vs. 0.52 (95 %CI 0.49-0.56); p 0.001), while reducing statin use by 10.1% (62.7% vs. 72.9% statin eligible, p 0.001). CONCLUSION: In stable chest pain patients, integration of CAD into guideline recommendations was associated with greater accuracy to reclassify those at increased risk for incident events and a more efficient use of statins.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Clin Med

DOI

ISSN

2077-0383

Publication Date

September 24, 2020

Volume

9

Issue

10

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pursnani, A., Taron, J., Mayrhofer, T., Lu, M. T., Ferencik, M., Ladapo, J. A., … Hoffmann, U. (2020). Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103076
Pursnani, Amit, Jana Taron, Thomas Mayrhofer, Michael T. Lu, Maros Ferencik, Joseph A. Ladapo, Pamela S. Douglas, and Udo Hoffmann. “Guideline-Based Statin Eligibility, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial.J Clin Med 9, no. 10 (September 24, 2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103076.

Published In

J Clin Med

DOI

ISSN

2077-0383

Publication Date

September 24, 2020

Volume

9

Issue

10

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences