Skip to main content

Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sandhu, S; Lin, AL; Brajer, N; Sperling, J; Ratliff, W; Bedoya, AD; Balu, S; O'Brien, C; Sendak, MP
Published in: J Med Internet Res
November 19, 2020

BACKGROUND: Machine learning models have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and management of acute conditions. Despite growing efforts to evaluate and validate such models, little is known about how to best translate and implement these products as part of routine clinical care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the factors influencing the integration of a machine learning sepsis early warning system (Sepsis Watch) into clinical workflows. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 frontline emergency department physicians and rapid response team nurses who participated in the Sepsis Watch quality improvement initiative. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. We used a modified grounded theory approach to identify key themes and analyze qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 3 dominant themes emerged: perceived utility and trust, implementation of Sepsis Watch processes, and workforce considerations. Participants described their unfamiliarity with machine learning models. As a result, clinician trust was influenced by the perceived accuracy and utility of the model from personal program experience. Implementation of Sepsis Watch was facilitated by the easy-to-use tablet application and communication strategies that were developed by nurses to share model outputs with physicians. Barriers included the flow of information among clinicians and gaps in knowledge about the model itself and broader workflow processes. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated insights into how frontline clinicians perceived machine learning models and the barriers to integrating them into clinical workflows. These findings can inform future efforts to implement machine learning interventions in real-world settings and maximize the adoption of these interventions.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Med Internet Res

DOI

EISSN

1438-8871

Publication Date

November 19, 2020

Volume

22

Issue

11

Start / End Page

e22421

Location

Canada

Related Subject Headings

  • Workflow
  • Qualitative Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning
  • Humans
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 08 Information and Computing Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sandhu, S., Lin, A. L., Brajer, N., Sperling, J., Ratliff, W., Bedoya, A. D., … Sendak, M. P. (2020). Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res, 22(11), e22421. https://doi.org/10.2196/22421
Sandhu, Sahil, Anthony L. Lin, Nathan Brajer, Jessica Sperling, William Ratliff, Armando D. Bedoya, Suresh Balu, Cara O’Brien, and Mark P. Sendak. “Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res 22, no. 11 (November 19, 2020): e22421. https://doi.org/10.2196/22421.
Sandhu S, Lin AL, Brajer N, Sperling J, Ratliff W, Bedoya AD, et al. Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 19;22(11):e22421.
Sandhu, Sahil, et al. “Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 11, Nov. 2020, p. e22421. Pubmed, doi:10.2196/22421.
Sandhu S, Lin AL, Brajer N, Sperling J, Ratliff W, Bedoya AD, Balu S, O’Brien C, Sendak MP. Integrating a Machine Learning System Into Clinical Workflows: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 19;22(11):e22421.

Published In

J Med Internet Res

DOI

EISSN

1438-8871

Publication Date

November 19, 2020

Volume

22

Issue

11

Start / End Page

e22421

Location

Canada

Related Subject Headings

  • Workflow
  • Qualitative Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning
  • Humans
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 08 Information and Computing Sciences