Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer patients: A quality improvement initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative (QI) to adopt universal screening for Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer patients at an institution that previously employed age-based screening. METHODS: Prior to the initiative, tumors of patients with uterine cancer diagnosed at age ≤ 60 years were screened for mismatch repair deficiency (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI). The QI process change model adopted universal testing of all uterine cancer specimens and implemented provider training, standardized documentation, and enhanced use of the electronic medical record (EMR). We compared screening rates, results of screening, follow up of abnormal results, and final diagnoses from the pre- and post-implementation periods. RESULTS: Pre- and post-implementation screening rates for women age ≤ 60 years at the time of diagnosis were 45/78 (57.7%) and 64/68 (94.5%), respectively. The screening rate for all patients with uterine cancer increased from 73/190 (38.4%) to 172/182 (94.5%). The rate of abnormal screening results increased from 15/190 (7.9%) to 44/182 (24.0%) cases. Genetics referral rates among screen positives increased from 3/15 (20.0%) to 16/44 (36.4%). Germline diagnoses increased from 2/190 (1.1%) with two Lynch syndrome diagnoses to 4/182 (2.2%) including three Lynch syndrome diagnoses and one BRCA1 germline diagnosis. The number of patients errantly not screened decreased from at least 32 patients to 3 patients after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to screening guidelines significantly improved after interventions involving provider education, optimal use of the EMR, and simplification of screening indications. These interventions are feasible at other institutions and translatable to other screening indications.

Duke Scholars

Author Laura Jean Havrilesky Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology

Author Kyle C. Strickland Pathology

Author Rebecca A Previs Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology