Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Loh, KP; Tsang, M; LeBlanc, TW; Back, A; Duberstein, PR; Mohile, SG; Epstein, RM; Klepin, HD; Becker, MW; El-Jawahri, A; Lee, SJ
Published in: Blood Adv
November 10, 2020

Understanding decisional involvement and information preferences in patients with hematologic malignancies may help to optimize physician-patient communication about treatment decisions and align the decision-making processes with patients' preferences. We described and examined factors associated with preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies for decisional involvement, information sources, and presentation of information. In a multicenter observational study, we recruited 216 patients with hematologic malignancies of any stage from September 2003 to June 2007. Patients were asked about their decisional involvement preferences (Control Preferences Scale), information sources (including most useful source of information), and preferences for their oncologists' presentation of treatment success information. We used multivariate logistic regressions to identify factors associated with decisional involvement preferences and usefulness of information sources (physicians vs nonphysicians). Patient-directed, shared, and physician-directed approaches were preferred in 34%, 38%, and 28% of patients, respectively. Physicians and computer/Internet were the most common information sources; 42% perceived physicians as the most useful source. On multivariate analysis, patients with less than a college education (vs postgraduate education) were less likely to perceive their physician as the most useful source (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-1.00), whereas patients with acute leukemia (vs other blood cancers) were more likely to perceive their physician as the most useful source (AOR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.07-5.80). In terms of communicating treatment success rates, 70% preferred ≥1 method(s), and 88% preferred presentation in percentages. Our study suggests that decisional involvement and information preferences vary and should be assessed explicitly as part of each decision-making encounter.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Blood Adv

DOI

EISSN

2473-9537

Publication Date

November 10, 2020

Volume

4

Issue

21

Start / End Page

5492 / 5500

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient Preference
  • Humans
  • Hematologic Neoplasms
  • Decision Making
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Loh, K. P., Tsang, M., LeBlanc, T. W., Back, A., Duberstein, P. R., Mohile, S. G., … Lee, S. J. (2020). Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv, 4(21), 5492–5500. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003044
Loh, Kah Poh, Mazie Tsang, Thomas W. LeBlanc, Anthony Back, Paul R. Duberstein, Supriya Gupta Mohile, Ronald M. Epstein, et al. “Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies.Blood Adv 4, no. 21 (November 10, 2020): 5492–5500. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003044.
Loh KP, Tsang M, LeBlanc TW, Back A, Duberstein PR, Mohile SG, et al. Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5492–500.
Loh, Kah Poh, et al. “Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies.Blood Adv, vol. 4, no. 21, Nov. 2020, pp. 5492–500. Pubmed, doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003044.
Loh KP, Tsang M, LeBlanc TW, Back A, Duberstein PR, Mohile SG, Epstein RM, Klepin HD, Becker MW, El-Jawahri A, Lee SJ. Decisional involvement and information preferences of patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5492–5500.

Published In

Blood Adv

DOI

EISSN

2473-9537

Publication Date

November 10, 2020

Volume

4

Issue

21

Start / End Page

5492 / 5500

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient Preference
  • Humans
  • Hematologic Neoplasms
  • Decision Making
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology