Skip to main content

Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Elliott, ML; Caspi, A; Houts, RM; Ambler, A; Broadbent, JM; Hancox, RJ; Harrington, H; Hogan, S; Keenan, R; Knodt, A; Leung, JH; Melzer, TR ...
Published in: Nature aging
March 2021

Some humans age faster than others. Variation in biological aging can be measured in midlife, but the implications of this variation are poorly understood. We tested associations between midlife biological aging and indicators of future frailty-risk in the Dunedin cohort of 1037 infants born the same year and followed to age 45. Participants' Pace of Aging was quantified by tracking declining function in 19 biomarkers indexing the cardiovascular, metabolic, renal, immune, dental, and pulmonary systems across ages 26, 32, 38, and 45 years. At age 45 in 2019, participants with faster Pace of Aging had more cognitive difficulties, signs of advanced brain aging, diminished sensory-motor functions, older appearance, and more pessimistic perceptions of aging. People who are aging more rapidly than same-age peers in midlife may prematurely need supports to sustain independence that are usually reserved for older adults. Chronological age does not adequately identify need for such supports.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Nature aging

DOI

EISSN

2662-8465

ISSN

2662-8465

Publication Date

March 2021

Volume

1

Issue

3

Start / End Page

295 / 308

Related Subject Headings

  • Policy
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Frailty
  • Brain
  • Aging
  • Aged
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Elliott, M. L., Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Ambler, A., Broadbent, J. M., Hancox, R. J., … Moffitt, T. E. (2021). Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy. Nature Aging, 1(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-021-00044-4
Elliott, Maxwell L., Avshalom Caspi, Renate M. Houts, Antony Ambler, Jonathan M. Broadbent, Robert J. Hancox, HonaLee Harrington, et al. “Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy.Nature Aging 1, no. 3 (March 2021): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-021-00044-4.
Elliott ML, Caspi A, Houts RM, Ambler A, Broadbent JM, Hancox RJ, et al. Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy. Nature aging. 2021 Mar;1(3):295–308.
Elliott, Maxwell L., et al. “Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy.Nature Aging, vol. 1, no. 3, Mar. 2021, pp. 295–308. Epmc, doi:10.1038/s43587-021-00044-4.
Elliott ML, Caspi A, Houts RM, Ambler A, Broadbent JM, Hancox RJ, Harrington H, Hogan S, Keenan R, Knodt A, Leung JH, Melzer TR, Purdy SC, Ramrakha S, Richmond-Rakerd LS, Righarts A, Sugden K, Thomson WM, Thorne PR, Williams BS, Wilson G, Hariri AR, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy. Nature aging. 2021 Mar;1(3):295–308.

Published In

Nature aging

DOI

EISSN

2662-8465

ISSN

2662-8465

Publication Date

March 2021

Volume

1

Issue

3

Start / End Page

295 / 308

Related Subject Headings

  • Policy
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Frailty
  • Brain
  • Aging
  • Aged
  • 3202 Clinical sciences