Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Samanta, S; Jiang, J; Hamdi, M; Register, AZ; Majewski, S; Williams, MB; Turkington, TG; Tornai, MP; Laforest, R; O'Sullivan, JA; Tai, Y-C
Published in: Phys Med Biol
May 20, 2021

This paper presents a novel PET geometry for breast cancer imaging. The scanner consists of a 'stadium' (a rectangle with two semi-circles on opposite sides) shaped ring, along with anterior and posterior panels to provide high sensitivity and high spatial resolution for an imaging field-of-view (FOV) that include both breasts, mediastinum and axilla. We simulated this total-breast PET system using GATE and reconstructed the coincidence events using a GPU-based list-mode image reconstruction implementing maximum likelihood expectation-maximization (ML-EM) algorithm. The rear-panel is made up of a single layer of LSO crystals (3.2 × 3.2 × 20 mm3each), while the 'stadium'-shaped elongated ring and the anterior panel are made with dual-layered LSO crystals (1.6 × 1.6 × 6 mm3each). The energy resolution and coincidence resolving time of all detectors are assumed to be 12% and 250 ps full-width-at-half-maximum, respectively. Various sized simulated lesions (4, 5, 6 mm) having 4:1, 5:1, and 6:1 lesion-to-background radioactivity concentration ratios, mimicking different biological uptakes, were strategically located throughout a volumetric torso phantom. We compared system sensitivity and lesion detectability of the dedicated total-breast PET system to a state-of-the-art clinical whole-body PET scanner. The mean sensitivity of the total-breast PET system is 3.21 times greater than that of a whole-body PET scanner in the breast regions. The total-breast PET system also provides better contrast-recovery coefficients for lesions of all sizes and lesion-to-background ratios in the breast when compared to a reference clinical whole-body PET scanner. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) study shows the area under the ROC curve is 0.948 and 0.924 for the total-breast system and the whole-body PET scanner, respectively, in the detection of 4 mm diameter lesions with 4:1 lesion-to-background ratio. This study demonstrates our novel geometry can provide an imaging FOV larger than conventional PEM systems to simultaneously image both breasts, chest wall and axillae with significantly improved lesion detectability in the breasts when compared to a whole-body PET scanner.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Phys Med Biol

DOI

EISSN

1361-6560

Publication Date

May 20, 2021

Volume

66

Issue

11

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Computer Simulation
  • Breast
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Samanta, S., Jiang, J., Hamdi, M., Register, A. Z., Majewski, S., Williams, M. B., … Tai, Y.-C. (2021). Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol, 66(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abfb16
Samanta, Suranjana, Jianyong Jiang, Mahdjoub Hamdi, Alan Z. Register, Stanislaw Majewski, Mark B. Williams, Timothy G. Turkington, et al. “Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study.Phys Med Biol 66, no. 11 (May 20, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abfb16.
Samanta S, Jiang J, Hamdi M, Register AZ, Majewski S, Williams MB, et al. Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol. 2021 May 20;66(11).
Samanta, Suranjana, et al. “Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study.Phys Med Biol, vol. 66, no. 11, May 2021. Pubmed, doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abfb16.
Samanta S, Jiang J, Hamdi M, Register AZ, Majewski S, Williams MB, Turkington TG, Tornai MP, Laforest R, O’Sullivan JA, Tai Y-C. Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study. Phys Med Biol. 2021 May 20;66(11).
Journal cover image

Published In

Phys Med Biol

DOI

EISSN

1361-6560

Publication Date

May 20, 2021

Volume

66

Issue

11

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Computer Simulation
  • Breast
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences