Modeling spatially biased citizen science effort through the eBird database

Citizen science databases are increasing in importance as sources of ecological information, but variability in effort across locations is inherent to such data. Spatially biased data—data not sampled uniformly across the study region—is expected. A further introduction of bias is variability in the level of sampling activity across locations. This motivates our work: with a spatial dataset of visited locations and sampling activity at those locations, we propose a model-based approach for assessing effort at these locations. Adjusting for potential spatial bias both in terms of sites visited and in terms of effort is crucial for developing reliable species distribution models (SDMs). Using data from eBird, a global citizen science database dedicated to avifauna, and illustrative regions in Pennsylvania and Germany, we model spatial dependence in both the observation locations and observed activity. We employ point process models to explain the observed locations in space, fit a geostatistical model to explain observation effort at locations, and explore the potential existence of preferential sampling, i.e., dependence between the two processes. Altogether, we offer a richer notion of sampling effort, combining information about location and activity. As SDMs are often used for their predictive capabilities, an important advantage of our approach is the ability to predict effort at unobserved locations and over regions. In this way, we can accommodate misalignment between point-referenced data and say, desired areal scale density. We briefly illustrate how our proposed methods can be applied to SDMs, with demonstrated improvement in prediction from models incorporating effort.

Duke Scholars

Author James S. Clark Environmental Sciences and Policy

Author Alan E. Gelfand Statistical Science