Skip to main content

Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cullom, ET; Xia, Y; Chuang, K-C; Gude, ZW; Zlateva, Y; Adamson, JD; Giles, WM
Published in: J Appl Clin Med Phys
July 2021

PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluate and compare single isocenter multiple target VMAT (SIMT) and Conformal Arc Informed VMAT (CAVMAT) radiosurgery's sensitivity to uncertainties in dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and treatment delivery. CAVMAT is a novel planning technique that uses multiple target conformal arcs as the starting point for limited inverse VMAT optimization. METHODS: All VMAT and CAVMAT plans were recalculated with DLG values of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mm. DLG effect on V6Gy [cc], V12Gy [cc], and V16Gy [cc], and target dose was evaluated. Plans were delivered to a Delta4 (ScandiDos, Madison, WI) phantom and gamma analysis performed with varying criteria. Log file analysis was performed to evaluate MLC positional error. Sixteen targets were delivered to a SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corp., Melbourne, FL) to evaluate VMAT and CAVMAT's dose difference (DD) as a function of DLG. RESULTS: VMAT's average maximum and minimum target dose sensitivity to DLG was 9.08 ±3.50%/mm and 9.50 ± 3.30%/mm, compared to 3.20 ± 1.60%/mm and 4.72 ± 1.60%/mm for CAVMAT. For VMAT, V6Gy [cc], V12Gy [cc], and V16Gy [cc] sensitivity was 35.83 ± 9.50%/mm, 34.12 ± 6.60%/mm, and 39.23 ± 8.40%/mm. In comparison, CAVMAT's sensitivity was 23.19 ± 4.50%/mm, 22.45 ± 4.40%/mm, and 24.88 ± 4.90%/mm, respectively. Upon delivery to the Delta4 , CAVMAT offered superior dose agreement compared to VMAT. For a 1%/1 mm gamma analysis, VMAT and CAVMAT had a passing rate of 94.53 ± 4.40% and 99.28 ± 1.70%, respectively. CAVMAT was more robust to DLG variation, with the SRS MapCHECK plans yielding an absolute average DD sensitivity of 2.99 ± 1.30%/mm compared to 5.07 ± 1.10%/mm for VMAT. Log files demonstrated minimal differences in MLC positional error for both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: CAVMAT remains robust to delivery uncertainties while offering a target dose sensitivity to DLG less than half that of VMAT, and 65% of that of VMAT for V6Gy [cc], V12Gy [cc], and V16Gy [cc]. The superior dose agreement and reduced sensitivity of CAVMAT to DLG uncertainties indicate promise as a robust alternative to VMAT for SIMT SRS.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Appl Clin Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

1526-9914

Publication Date

July 2021

Volume

22

Issue

7

Start / End Page

36 / 43

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uncertainty
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiosurgery
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Humans
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 3208 Medical physiology
  • 1116 Medical Physiology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cullom, E. T., Xia, Y., Chuang, K.-C., Gude, Z. W., Zlateva, Y., Adamson, J. D., & Giles, W. M. (2021). Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 22(7), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13248
Cullom, Edward T., Yuqing Xia, Kai-Cheng Chuang, Zachary W. Gude, Yana Zlateva, Justus D. Adamson, and William M. Giles. “Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT.J Appl Clin Med Phys 22, no. 7 (July 2021): 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13248.
Cullom ET, Xia Y, Chuang K-C, Gude ZW, Zlateva Y, Adamson JD, et al. Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jul;22(7):36–43.
Cullom, Edward T., et al. “Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT.J Appl Clin Med Phys, vol. 22, no. 7, July 2021, pp. 36–43. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/acm2.13248.
Cullom ET, Xia Y, Chuang K-C, Gude ZW, Zlateva Y, Adamson JD, Giles WM. Single isocenter SRS using CAVMAT offers improved robustness to commissioning and treatment delivery uncertainty compared to VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jul;22(7):36–43.

Published In

J Appl Clin Med Phys

DOI

EISSN

1526-9914

Publication Date

July 2021

Volume

22

Issue

7

Start / End Page

36 / 43

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uncertainty
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiosurgery
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Humans
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 3208 Medical physiology
  • 1116 Medical Physiology