Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography.
Publication
, Journal Article
Shuster, MJ; Vaish, A; Cao, HH; Guttentag, AI; McManigle, JE; Gibb, AL; Martinez-Rivera, M; Nezarati, RM; Hinds, JM; Liao, W-S; Weiss, PS; Andrews, AM
Published in: Chem Commun (Camb)
October 14, 2011
Chemical patterns prepared by self-assembly, combined with soft lithography or photolithography, are directly compared. Pattern fidelity can be controlled in both cases but patterning at the low densities necessary for small-molecule probe capture of large biomolecule targets is better accomplished using microcontact insertion printing (μCIP). Surfaces patterned by μCIP are used to capture biomolecule binding partners for the small molecules dopamine and biotin.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Chem Commun (Camb)
DOI
EISSN
1364-548X
Publication Date
October 14, 2011
Volume
47
Issue
38
Start / End Page
10641 / 10643
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Surface Properties
- Streptavidin
- Rabbits
- Organic Chemistry
- Microscopy, Fluorescence
- Hydrazines
- Gold
- Dopamine
- Biotin
- Antibodies
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Shuster, M. J., Vaish, A., Cao, H. H., Guttentag, A. I., McManigle, J. E., Gibb, A. L., … Andrews, A. M. (2011). Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography. Chem Commun (Camb), 47(38), 10641–10643. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc13002a
Shuster, M. J., A. Vaish, H. H. Cao, A. I. Guttentag, J. E. McManigle, A. L. Gibb, M. Martinez-Rivera, et al. “Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography.” Chem Commun (Camb) 47, no. 38 (October 14, 2011): 10641–43. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc13002a.
Shuster MJ, Vaish A, Cao HH, Guttentag AI, McManigle JE, Gibb AL, et al. Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011 Oct 14;47(38):10641–3.
Shuster, M. J., et al. “Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography.” Chem Commun (Camb), vol. 47, no. 38, Oct. 2011, pp. 10641–43. Pubmed, doi:10.1039/c1cc13002a.
Shuster MJ, Vaish A, Cao HH, Guttentag AI, McManigle JE, Gibb AL, Martinez-Rivera M, Nezarati RM, Hinds JM, Liao W-S, Weiss PS, Andrews AM. Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011 Oct 14;47(38):10641–10643.
Published In
Chem Commun (Camb)
DOI
EISSN
1364-548X
Publication Date
October 14, 2011
Volume
47
Issue
38
Start / End Page
10641 / 10643
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Surface Properties
- Streptavidin
- Rabbits
- Organic Chemistry
- Microscopy, Fluorescence
- Hydrazines
- Gold
- Dopamine
- Biotin
- Antibodies