Skip to main content

A quantitative analysis of sources of changes in government expenditures on health, 2000 to 2015: What can we learn from experience to date?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Saxenian, H; Bharali, I; Ogbuoji, O; Yamey, G
Published in: Gates Open Research
January 1, 2021

Background: Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) requires increased domestic financing of health by low-income countries (LICs) and middle-income countries (MICs). It is critical to understand how much governments have devoted to health from domestic sources and how much growth might be realistic over time. Methods: Using data from WHO's Global Health Expenditure Database, we examined how the composition of current health expenditure changed by financing source and the sources of growth in health expenditures from 2000-2015 across different income groups. We disaggregated how much growth in government expenditures on health from domestic sources was due to economic growth, growth in government spending as a share of GDP, and reallocations in government expenditures towards health. Results: Lower MICs (LMICs) and upper MICs (UMICs), as a group, saw a significant reduction in out-of-pocket expenditures and a significant growth in government expenditures on health from domestic sources as a share of current health expenditures over the period. This trend indicates likely progress in the pathway to UHC. For LICs, these trends were more muted. Growth in government expenditure on health from domestic sources was driven primarily by economic growth in LICs, LMICs, and UMICs. Growth in government expenditure on health due to increased government spending as a share of GDP was high in UMICs. For the high-income country group, where economic growth was relatively slower and government spending was already high with strong tax bases, the largest driver of growth in government expenditure on health from domestic sources was reallocation of the government budget towards health. Conclusions: Dialogue on domestic resource mobilization needs to emphasize overall economic growth and growth in the government spending as a share of GDP as well as the share of health in the government budget.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Gates Open Research

DOI

EISSN

2572-4754

Publication Date

January 1, 2021

Volume

3

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Saxenian, H., Bharali, I., Ogbuoji, O., & Yamey, G. (2021). A quantitative analysis of sources of changes in government expenditures on health, 2000 to 2015: What can we learn from experience to date? Gates Open Research, 3. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12900.2
Saxenian, H., I. Bharali, O. Ogbuoji, and G. Yamey. “A quantitative analysis of sources of changes in government expenditures on health, 2000 to 2015: What can we learn from experience to date?Gates Open Research 3 (January 1, 2021). https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12900.2.
Saxenian, H., et al. “A quantitative analysis of sources of changes in government expenditures on health, 2000 to 2015: What can we learn from experience to date?Gates Open Research, vol. 3, Jan. 2021. Scopus, doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.12900.2.

Published In

Gates Open Research

DOI

EISSN

2572-4754

Publication Date

January 1, 2021

Volume

3

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences