Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Photographic assessment of eyelid position using a simple measurement tool paired with cell phone photography in a pediatric population.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Prakalapakorn, SG; Weinert, MC; Stinnett, SS
Published in: J AAPOS
October 2021

PURPOSE: This proof-of-concept study evaluates the ability to assess eyelid measurements and the reproducibility of eyelid measurements using a simple measurement tool paired with digital cell phone photography in children. METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients and their siblings, 2-19 years of age, were prospectively enrolled. Participants underwent clinical examination and cell phone photography with a simple measurement tool. An ophthalmologist and nonophthalmologist assessed photographs for interpalpebral fissure distance (IPFD), margin reflex distance-1 (MRD1), and levator function (LF). Clinical examinations and photographs were repeated on the same day in a random sample (n = 20). The agreement of grading photographs compared to clinical examination was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Intra-grader repeatability of the clinical examination, repeatability of photographic technique, and interobserver reproducibility of photographic assessment was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Of photographs acquired, both graders considered quality good/fair in 100% to assess IPFD and MRD1, and 70% to assess LF. The mean difference (limits of agreement) in mm between clinical examination and photographic assessment was 1.1 (-1.5 to 3.8) for IPFD, 0.7 (-1.8 to 3.1) for MRD1, and 1.1 (-3.5 to 5.7) for LF. Intraobserver repeatability on clinical examination was excellent for IPFD (ICC = 0.81), MRD1 (ICC = 0.88), and LF (ICC = 0.94). Repeatability of photographic technique was fair for IPFD (ICC = 0.44) and good for MRD1 (ICC = 0.74) and LF (ICC = 0.77). Interobserver photographic assessment repeatability was excellent for IPFD (ICC = 0.94), MRD1 (ICC = 0.96), and LF (ICC = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Photographic assessment of eyelid measurements in children is possible, highly reproducible between graders, and enables documentation for future comparison.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J AAPOS

DOI

EISSN

1528-3933

Publication Date

October 2021

Volume

25

Issue

5

Start / End Page

289.e1 / 289.e6

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Photography
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Observer Variation
  • Humans
  • Eyelids
  • Child
  • Cell Phone
  • 3212 Ophthalmology and optometry
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Prakalapakorn, S. G., Weinert, M. C., & Stinnett, S. S. (2021). Photographic assessment of eyelid position using a simple measurement tool paired with cell phone photography in a pediatric population. J AAPOS, 25(5), 289.e1-289.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.05.020
Prakalapakorn, S Grace, Marguerite C. Weinert, and Sandra S. Stinnett. “Photographic assessment of eyelid position using a simple measurement tool paired with cell phone photography in a pediatric population.J AAPOS 25, no. 5 (October 2021): 289.e1-289.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.05.020.
Prakalapakorn, S. Grace, et al. “Photographic assessment of eyelid position using a simple measurement tool paired with cell phone photography in a pediatric population.J AAPOS, vol. 25, no. 5, Oct. 2021, pp. 289.e1-289.e6. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.05.020.
Journal cover image

Published In

J AAPOS

DOI

EISSN

1528-3933

Publication Date

October 2021

Volume

25

Issue

5

Start / End Page

289.e1 / 289.e6

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Photography
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Observer Variation
  • Humans
  • Eyelids
  • Child
  • Cell Phone
  • 3212 Ophthalmology and optometry
  • 3202 Clinical sciences