Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Umfress, AC; Glaser, TS; Ploysangam, P; Freedman, SF
Published in: J AAPOS
December 2021

BACKGROUND: Tonometry guides decision making in children with known or suspected glaucoma. The iCare IC200 is a recently FDA-approved rebound tonometer that can measure intraocular pressure (IOP) in both supine and upright patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this new tonometer against more commonly used standard instruments: Tono-Pen in the operating room (OR arm) and Goldmann applanation in the clinic (clinic arm). METHODS: The OR arm included sequential children undergoing general anesthesia. The clinic arm included cooperative children seen in clinic. IOP was measured twice (right eye then left eye, repeat) with IC200 and either Tono-Pen (OR arm) or Goldmann (clinic arm). RESULTS: A total of 99 children were included: 75 for the OR arm and 24 for the clinic arm. There was a strong correlation between the IOP measured by IC200 and each device (R2 = 0.81 for Tono-Pen; R2 = 0.78 for Goldmann). In the OR arm, the overall mean IOP difference (ΔIOP [Tono-Pen - IC200]) was -1.6 mm Hg. For eyes with corneal edema (n = 12), ΔIOP ranged from -8 to 15 mm Hg. At IOP >20 mm Hg, mean ΔIOP was -3.7 mm Hg. In the clinic arm, the mean ΔIOP (ΔIOP [Goldmann - IC200]) was -1.2 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes of children under general anesthesia with IOP <20 mm Hg without corneal edema, IC200 and Tono-Pen correlated well. In cooperative clinic patients, Goldmann and IC200 correlated well over the range of IOP studied.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J AAPOS

DOI

EISSN

1528-3933

Publication Date

December 2021

Volume

25

Issue

6

Start / End Page

329.e1 / 329.e6

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tonometry, Ocular
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Operating Rooms
  • Manometry
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans
  • Child
  • 3212 Ophthalmology and optometry
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Umfress, A. C., Glaser, T. S., Ploysangam, P., & Freedman, S. F. (2021). Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic. J AAPOS, 25(6), 329.e1-329.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.07.010
Umfress, Allison C., Tanya S. Glaser, Pimpiroon Ploysangam, and Sharon F. Freedman. “Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic.J AAPOS 25, no. 6 (December 2021): 329.e1-329.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.07.010.
Umfress AC, Glaser TS, Ploysangam P, Freedman SF. Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic. J AAPOS. 2021 Dec;25(6):329.e1-329.e6.
Umfress, Allison C., et al. “Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic.J AAPOS, vol. 25, no. 6, Dec. 2021, pp. 329.e1-329.e6. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.07.010.
Umfress AC, Glaser TS, Ploysangam P, Freedman SF. Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic. J AAPOS. 2021 Dec;25(6):329.e1-329.e6.
Journal cover image

Published In

J AAPOS

DOI

EISSN

1528-3933

Publication Date

December 2021

Volume

25

Issue

6

Start / End Page

329.e1 / 329.e6

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tonometry, Ocular
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Operating Rooms
  • Manometry
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans
  • Child
  • 3212 Ophthalmology and optometry
  • 3202 Clinical sciences