Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of Cilta-cel, an Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy, Versus Conventional Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Costa, LJ; Lin, Y; Cornell, RF; Martin, T; Chhabra, S; Usmani, SZ; Jagannath, S; Callander, NS; Berdeja, JG; Kang, Y; Vij, R; Godby, KN ...
Published in: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
May 2022

BACKGROUND: In the single-arm, phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, showed encouraging efficacy in US patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who previously received an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (triple-class exposed). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A dataset of US patients refractory to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MAMMOTH) was used to identify patients who would meet eligibility for CARTITUDE-1 and received subsequent non-CAR-T therapy. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population in CARTITUDE-1 included patients who underwent apheresis (N = 113); the modified ITT (mITT) population was the subset who received cilta-cel (n = 97). Corresponding populations were identified from the MAMMOTH dataset: ITT population (n = 190) and mITT population of patients without progression/death within 47 days (median apheresis-to-cilta-cel infusion time) from onset of therapy (n = 122). Using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching to control for selected baseline covariates, 95 and 69 patients in CARTITUDE-1 ITT and mITT populations, respectively, were matched to MAMMOTH patients. RESULTS: In ITT cohorts of CARTITUDE-1 vs. MAMMOTH, improved overall response rate (ORR; 84% vs. 28% [P < .001]) and longer progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.22]) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.10-0.39]) were observed. Similar results were seen in mITT cohorts of CARTITUDE-1 vs. MAMMOTH (ORR: 96% vs. 30% [P < .001]; PFS: HR, 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.14]; OS: HR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.22]) and with alternative matching methods. CONCLUSION: Cilta-cel yielded significantly improved outcomes versus real-world therapies in triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory MM.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk

DOI

EISSN

2152-2669

Publication Date

May 2022

Volume

22

Issue

5

Start / End Page

326 / 335

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Immunotherapy, Adoptive
  • Humans
  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
  • Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Costa, L. J., Lin, Y., Cornell, R. F., Martin, T., Chhabra, S., Usmani, S. Z., … Hari, P. (2022). Comparison of Cilta-cel, an Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy, Versus Conventional Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 22(5), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.10.013
Costa, Luciano J., Yi Lin, R Frank Cornell, Thomas Martin, Saurabh Chhabra, Saad Z. Usmani, Sundar Jagannath, et al. “Comparison of Cilta-cel, an Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy, Versus Conventional Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 22, no. 5 (May 2022): 326–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.10.013.
Costa LJ, Lin Y, Cornell RF, Martin T, Chhabra S, Usmani SZ, et al. Comparison of Cilta-cel, an Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy, Versus Conventional Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 May;22(5):326–35.
Costa, Luciano J., et al. “Comparison of Cilta-cel, an Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy, Versus Conventional Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, vol. 22, no. 5, May 2022, pp. 326–35. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.clml.2021.10.013.
Costa LJ, Lin Y, Cornell RF, Martin T, Chhabra S, Usmani SZ, Jagannath S, Callander NS, Berdeja JG, Kang Y, Vij R, Godby KN, Malek E, Neppalli A, Liedtke M, Fiala M, Tian H, Valluri S, Marino J, Jackson CC, Banerjee A, Kansagra A, Schecter JM, Kumar S, Hari P. Comparison of Cilta-cel, an Anti-BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy, Versus Conventional Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 May;22(5):326–335.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk

DOI

EISSN

2152-2669

Publication Date

May 2022

Volume

22

Issue

5

Start / End Page

326 / 335

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Immunotherapy, Adoptive
  • Humans
  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
  • Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology