Skip to main content
Journal cover image
An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited

Publication ,  Chapter
Flanagan, O; Jackson, K
January 1, 2016

In 1958, G. E. M. Anscombe wrote, “It is not profitable for us at present to do moral philosophy; that should be laid aside at any rate until we have an adequate philosophy of psychology, in which we are conspicuously lacking” (186). Anscombe hinted (and she and many others pursued the hint) that the Aristotelian tradition was the best place to look for a richer and less shadowy conception of moral agency than either utilitarianism or Kantianism had provided.

Duke Scholars

DOI

ISBN

9781134712465

Publication Date

January 1, 2016

Start / End Page

69 / 84
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Flanagan, O., & Jackson, K. (2016). Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. In An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 69–84). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760192-13
Flanagan, O., and K. Jackson. “Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited.” In An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 69–84, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203760192-13.
Flanagan O, Jackson K. Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. In: An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2016. p. 69–84.
Flanagan, O., and K. Jackson. “Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited.” An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2016, pp. 69–84. Scopus, doi:10.4324/9780203760192-13.
Flanagan O, Jackson K. Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2016. p. 69–84.
Journal cover image

DOI

ISBN

9781134712465

Publication Date

January 1, 2016

Start / End Page

69 / 84