Skip to main content

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

Publication ,  Journal Article
Abbott, TMC; Aguena, M; Alarcon, A; Allam, S; Alves, O; Amon, A; Andrade-Oliveira, F; Annis, J; Avila, S; Bacon, D; Baxter, E; Bechtol, K ...
Published in: Physical Review D
January 15, 2022

We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure using the full 5000 deg2 of imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Data Release 1. We perform an analysis of large-scale structure combining three two-point correlation functions (3×2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions, galaxy-galaxy lensing. To achieve the cosmological precision enabled by these measurements has required updates to nearly every part of the analysis from DES Year 1, including the use of two independent galaxy clustering samples, modeling advances, and several novel improvements in the calibration of gravitational shear and photometric redshift inference. The analysis was performed under strict conditions to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results and tests of the robustness of our results to this decision. We model the data within the flat ΛCDM and wCDM cosmological models, marginalizing over 25 nuisance parameters. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude S8=0.776-0.017+0.017 and matter density ωm=0.339-0.031+0.032 in ΛCDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; S8=0.775-0.024+0.026, ωm=0.352-0.041+0.035, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter w=-0.98-0.20+0.32 in wCDM. These constraints correspond to an improvement in signal-to-noise of the DES Year 3 3×2pt data relative to DES Year 1 by a factor of 2.1, about 20% more than expected from the increase in observing area alone. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed p=0.13-0.48. We find better agreement between DES 3×2pt and Planck than in DES Y1, despite the significantly improved precision of both. When combining DES 3×2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find p=0.34. Combining all of these datasets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of S8=0.812-0.008+0.008, ωm=0.306-0.005+0.004, h=0.680-0.003+0.004, and mν<0.13 eV (95% C.L.) in ΛCDM; S8=0.812-0.008+0.008, ωm=0.302-0.006+0.006, h=0.687-0.007+0.006, and w=-1.031-0.027+0.030 in wCDM.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Physical Review D

DOI

EISSN

2470-0029

ISSN

2470-0010

Publication Date

January 15, 2022

Volume

105

Issue

2
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., … Lima, M. (2022). Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Physical Review D, 105(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520
Abbott, T. M. C., M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, et al. “Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing.” Physical Review D 105, no. 2 (January 15, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520.
Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Allam S, Alves O, Amon A, et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Physical Review D. 2022 Jan 15;105(2).
Abbott, T. M. C., et al. “Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing.” Physical Review D, vol. 105, no. 2, Jan. 2022. Scopus, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520.
Abbott TMC, Aguena M, Alarcon A, Allam S, Alves O, Amon A, Andrade-Oliveira F, Annis J, Avila S, Bacon D, Baxter E, Bechtol K, Becker MR, Bernstein GM, Bhargava S, Birrer S, Blazek J, Brandao-Souza A, Bridle SL, Brooks D, Buckley-Geer E, Burke DL, Camacho H, Campos A, Carnero Rosell A, Carrasco Kind M, Carretero J, Castander FJ, Cawthon R, Chang C, Chen A, Chen R, Choi A, Conselice C, Cordero J, Costanzi M, Crocce M, Da Costa LN, Da Silva Pereira ME, Davis C, Davis TM, De Vicente J, Derose J, Desai S, Di Valentino E, Diehl HT, Dietrich JP, Dodelson S, Doel P, Doux C, Drlica-Wagner A, Eckert K, Eifler TF, Elsner F, Elvin-Poole J, Everett S, Evrard AE, Fang X, Farahi A, Fernandez E, Ferrero I, Ferté A, Fosalba P, Friedrich O, Frieman J, García-Bellido J, Gatti M, Gaztanaga E, Gerdes DW, Giannantonio T, Giannini G, Gruen D, Gruendl RA, Gschwend J, Gutierrez G, Harrison I, Hartley WG, Herner K, Hinton SR, Hollowood DL, Honscheid K, Hoyle B, Huff EM, Huterer D, Jain B, James DJ, Jarvis M, Jeffrey N, Jeltema T, Kovacs A, Krause E, Kron R, Kuehn K, Kuropatkin N, Lahav O, Leget PF, Lemos P, Liddle AR, Lidman C, Lima M. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Physical Review D. 2022 Jan 15;105(2).

Published In

Physical Review D

DOI

EISSN

2470-0029

ISSN

2470-0010

Publication Date

January 15, 2022

Volume

105

Issue

2