Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fordyce, CB; Hill, CL; Mark, DB; Alhanti, B; Pellikka, PA; Hoffmann, U; Patel, MR; Douglas, PS; PROMISE Investigators,
Published in: Heart
May 12, 2022

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate informal physician judgement versus pretest probability scores in estimating risk in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We included 4533 patients from the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial. Physicians categorised a priori the pretest probability of obstructive CAD (≥70% or ≥50% left main); Diamond-Forrester (D-F) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) pretest probability estimates were calculated. Agreement was calculated using the κ statistic; logistic regression evaluated estimates of pretest CAD probability and actual CAD (as determined by CT coronary angiography), and clinical outcomes were modelled using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Physician estimates agreed poorly with D-F (κ 0.16; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.18) and ESC (κ 0.04; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.05). Actual obstructive CAD was significantly more prevalent in both the high-likelihood (OR 3.30; 95% CI 2.30 to 4.74) and the intermediate-likelihood (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.76) physician-estimated groups versus the low-likelihood group; ESC similarly differentiated between the three groups (OR 9.07; 95% CI 2.87 to 28.70; and OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.22 to 12.28). However, using D-F, only the high-probability group differed (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.54). Only physician estimates were associated with a higher incidence of adjusted death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalisation in the high-probability versus low-probability group (HR 2.68; 95% CI 1.52 to 4.74); neither pretest probability score provided prognostic information. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with D-F and ESC estimates, physician judgement more accurately identified obstructive CAD and worse patient outcomes. Integrating physician judgement may improve risk prediction for patients with stable chest pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01174550.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Heart

DOI

EISSN

1468-201X

Publication Date

May 12, 2022

Volume

108

Issue

11

Start / End Page

860 / 867

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Assessment
  • Prospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Physicians
  • Humans
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Chest Pain
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fordyce, C. B., Hill, C. L., Mark, D. B., Alhanti, B., Pellikka, P. A., Hoffmann, U., … PROMISE Investigators, . (2022). Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients. Heart, 108(11), 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320275
Fordyce, Christopher B., C Larry Hill, Daniel B. Mark, Brooke Alhanti, Patricia A. Pellikka, Udo Hoffmann, Manesh R. Patel, Pamela S. Douglas, and Pamela S. PROMISE Investigators. “Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients.Heart 108, no. 11 (May 12, 2022): 860–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320275.
Fordyce CB, Hill CL, Mark DB, Alhanti B, Pellikka PA, Hoffmann U, et al. Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients. Heart. 2022 May 12;108(11):860–7.
Fordyce, Christopher B., et al. “Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients.Heart, vol. 108, no. 11, May 2022, pp. 860–67. Pubmed, doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320275.
Fordyce CB, Hill CL, Mark DB, Alhanti B, Pellikka PA, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Douglas PS, PROMISE Investigators. Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients. Heart. 2022 May 12;108(11):860–867.

Published In

Heart

DOI

EISSN

1468-201X

Publication Date

May 12, 2022

Volume

108

Issue

11

Start / End Page

860 / 867

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Assessment
  • Prospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Physicians
  • Humans
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Chest Pain
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology