Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Constructing and evaluating a validity argument for a performance outcome measure for clinical trials: An example using the Multi-luminance Mobility Test.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Weinfurt, KP
Published in: Clin Trials
April 2022

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials that evaluate new medical products often use clinical outcome assessments to measure how patients feel or function. Determining the evidentiary support needed for clinical outcome assessments is challenging but necessary to ensure scores from a clinical outcome assessment reflect the relevant aspects of patients' health. Modern validity theory-from educational and psychological testing-addresses the challenge by requiring that investigators state key assumptions underlying the proposed use of a clinical outcome assessment and collect evidence for or against those assumptions. METHODS: This article describes the argument-based approach to validity using an example of a performance outcome measure-the Multi-luminance Mobility Test-designed to assess patients with inherited retinal dystrophy that causes progressive loss of night vision. For the proposed interpretation and use of a performance outcome measure to be reasonable, several key assumptions need to be plausible. I describe the assumptions along with examples of supporting evidence from the published literature to evaluate each assumption within the rationale. RESULTS: This article provides an example of a validity rationale to evaluate a clinical outcome assessment using the Multi-luminance Mobility Test as an example. CONCLUSION: The demonstration illustrates the use of the argument-based approach to validity evaluation and the challenges in supporting parts of a validity rationale for clinical outcome assessments that measure how patients feel and function in a more indirect way. By making clinical outcome assessment validation practices consistent with modern validity theory, investigators, sponsors, and regulators should be able to communicate more clearly and direct resources more efficiently to support the creation of patient-centered endpoints in clinical trials.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Trials

DOI

EISSN

1740-7753

Publication Date

April 2022

Volume

19

Issue

2

Start / End Page

184 / 193

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics & Probability
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Humans
  • Data Collection
  • 5203 Clinical and health psychology
  • 4905 Statistics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0104 Statistics
 
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Trials

DOI

EISSN

1740-7753

Publication Date

April 2022

Volume

19

Issue

2

Start / End Page

184 / 193

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics & Probability
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Humans
  • Data Collection
  • 5203 Clinical and health psychology
  • 4905 Statistics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0104 Statistics