Skip to main content

Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Andelin, CO; Drobnis, EZ; Schust, DJ
Published in: Obstet Gynecol
July 2010

Duke Scholars

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1873-233X

Publication Date

July 2010

Volume

116

Issue

1

Start / End Page

194 / 195

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Students
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Patient Compliance
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Contraceptive Devices, Female
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Andelin, C. O., Drobnis, E. Z., & Schust, D. J. (2010). Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 116(1), 194–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e5a895
Andelin, Clark O., Erma Z. Drobnis, and Danny J. Schust. “Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol 116, no. 1 (July 2010): 194–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e5a895.
Andelin, Clark O., et al. “Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol, vol. 116, no. 1, July 2010, pp. 194–95. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e5a895.

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1873-233X

Publication Date

July 2010

Volume

116

Issue

1

Start / End Page

194 / 195

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Students
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Patient Compliance
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Contraceptive Devices, Female
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine