Skip to main content

Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Levi, EE; Stuart, GS; Zerden, ML; Garrett, JM; Bryant, AG
Published in: Obstet Gynecol
July 2015

OBJECTIVE: To compare intrauterine device (IUD) use at 6 months postpartum among women who underwent intracesarean delivery (during cesarean delivery) IUD placement compared with women who planned for interval IUD placement 6 or more weeks postpartum. METHODS: In this nonblinded randomized trial, women who were undergoing a cesarean delivery and desired an IUD were randomized to intracesarean delivery or interval IUD placement. The primary outcome was IUD use at 6 months postpartum. A sample size of 112 (56 in each group) was planned to detect a 15% difference in IUD use at 6 months postpartum between groups. RESULTS: From March 2012 to June 2014, 172 women were screened and 112 women were randomized into the trial. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Data regarding IUD use at 6 months postpartum were available for 98 women, 48 and 50 women in the intracesarean delivery and interval groups, respectively. A larger proportion of the women in the intracesarean delivery group were using an IUD at 6 months postpartum (40/48 [83%]) compared with those in the interval group (32/50 [64%], relative risk 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.66). Among the 56 women randomized to interval IUD insertion, 22 (39%) of them never received an IUD; 14 (25%) never returned for IUD placement, five (9%) women declined an IUD, and three (5%) had a failed IUD placement. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine device placement at the time of cesarean delivery leads to a higher proportion of IUD use at 6 months postpartum when compared with interval IUD placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1873-233X

Publication Date

July 2015

Volume

126

Issue

1

Start / End Page

5 / 11

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pregnancy
  • Postpartum Period
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Intrauterine Devices
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Levi, E. E., Stuart, G. S., Zerden, M. L., Garrett, J. M., & Bryant, A. G. (2015). Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol, 126(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000882
Levi, Erika E., Gretchen S. Stuart, Matthew L. Zerden, Joanne M. Garrett, and Amy G. Bryant. “Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obstet Gynecol 126, no. 1 (July 2015): 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000882.
Levi EE, Stuart GS, Zerden ML, Garrett JM, Bryant AG. Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):5–11.
Levi, Erika E., et al. “Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obstet Gynecol, vol. 126, no. 1, July 2015, pp. 5–11. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000882.
Levi EE, Stuart GS, Zerden ML, Garrett JM, Bryant AG. Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):5–11.

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1873-233X

Publication Date

July 2015

Volume

126

Issue

1

Start / End Page

5 / 11

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pregnancy
  • Postpartum Period
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Intrauterine Devices
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female