Skip to main content

Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Summers, AJ; Devadhasan, JP; Gu, J; Montgomery, DC; Fischer, B; Gates-Hollingsworth, MA; Pflughoeft, KJ; Vo-Dinh, T; AuCoin, DP; Zenhausern, F
Published in: ACS omega
September 2022

Antibody microarrays have proven useful in immunoassay-based point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases. Noncontact piezoelectric inkjet printing has advantages to print antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose substrates for this application due to its compatibility with sensitive solutions and substrates, simple droplet control, and potential for high-capacity printing. However, there remain real-world challenges in printing such microarrays, which motivated this study. The effects of three concentrations of capture antibody (cAb) reagents and nozzle hydrostatic pressures were chosen to investigate three responses: the number of printed membrane disks, dispensing performance, and microarray quality. Printing conditions were found to be most ideal with 5 mg/mL cAb and a nozzle hydrostatic pressure near zero, which produced 130 membrane disks in a single print versus the 10 membrane disks per print before optimization. These results serve to inform efficient printing of antibody microarrays on nitrocellulose membranes for rapid immunoassay-based detection of infectious diseases and beyond.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

ACS omega

DOI

EISSN

2470-1343

ISSN

2470-1343

Publication Date

September 2022

Volume

7

Issue

36

Start / End Page

32262 / 32271

Related Subject Headings

  • 4004 Chemical engineering
  • 3406 Physical chemistry
  • 3403 Macromolecular and materials chemistry
  • 0912 Materials Engineering
  • 0904 Chemical Engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Summers, A. J., Devadhasan, J. P., Gu, J., Montgomery, D. C., Fischer, B., Gates-Hollingsworth, M. A., … Zenhausern, F. (2022). Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment. ACS Omega, 7(36), 32262–32271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03595
Summers, Alexander J., Jasmine P. Devadhasan, Jian Gu, Douglas C. Montgomery, Brittany Fischer, Marcellene A. Gates-Hollingsworth, Kathryn J. Pflughoeft, Tuan Vo-Dinh, David P. AuCoin, and Frederic Zenhausern. “Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment.ACS Omega 7, no. 36 (September 2022): 32262–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03595.
Summers AJ, Devadhasan JP, Gu J, Montgomery DC, Fischer B, Gates-Hollingsworth MA, et al. Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment. ACS omega. 2022 Sep;7(36):32262–71.
Summers, Alexander J., et al. “Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment.ACS Omega, vol. 7, no. 36, Sept. 2022, pp. 32262–71. Epmc, doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c03595.
Summers AJ, Devadhasan JP, Gu J, Montgomery DC, Fischer B, Gates-Hollingsworth MA, Pflughoeft KJ, Vo-Dinh T, AuCoin DP, Zenhausern F. Optimization of an Antibody Microarray Printing Process Using a Designed Experiment. ACS omega. 2022 Sep;7(36):32262–32271.

Published In

ACS omega

DOI

EISSN

2470-1343

ISSN

2470-1343

Publication Date

September 2022

Volume

7

Issue

36

Start / End Page

32262 / 32271

Related Subject Headings

  • 4004 Chemical engineering
  • 3406 Physical chemistry
  • 3403 Macromolecular and materials chemistry
  • 0912 Materials Engineering
  • 0904 Chemical Engineering