Readability, Content, and Accountability Assessment of Online Health Information for Retinitis Pigmentosa & Retinitis Pigmentosa Treatment Options.

PURPOSE: New therapies for retinitis pigmentosa (RP) have led to patients desiring more information about their disease. We assessed the readability, content, and accountability of online health information for RP and its treatments. METHODS: Two internet queries were performed: one pertaining to the condition RP, and another pertaining to treatments of RP. Three analyses were performed on the top search results that met eligibility criteria: (1) A readability analysis produced an average reading level; (2) A content analysis was conducted to score each source on the accuracy, completeness, clarity, and organization of the content; and (3) An accountability analysis was performed to evaluate adherence to accountability benchmarks, including authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency. RESULTS: The mean reading level was 12.0 (SD = 3.2, 95% CI = 11.0-13.0) for the 8 RP webpages and 12.5 (SD = 3.1, 95% CI = 11.7-13.4) for the 10 RP treatment webpages. The mean content score for RP sites was 21.3 of 32 points (SD = 4.1, 95% CI = 19.5-23.0). The mean content score for RP treatment sites was 5.5 out of 16 points (SD = 3.7, 95% CI = 4.1-6.9). The inter-rater reliability was 0.973 (Cronbach's alpha). For RP sites, the mean accountability score was 2.6 out of 4 points (SD = 0.9, 95% CI = 1.9-3.4). For RP treatment sites, the mean accountability score was 2 out of 4 points (SD = 0.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.6). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the online information available to patients regarding RP and RP treatment options exceeds the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level and contains gaps in content relevant to patients.

Duke Scholars

Author Kelly Walton Muir Ophthalmology, Glaucoma