Skip to main content

Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bansal, S; Keah, NM; Neuwirth, AL; O'Reilly, O; Qu, F; Seiber, BN; Mandalapu, S; Mauck, RL; Zgonis, MH
Published in: Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods
November 2017

Injury to the meniscus is common, but few viable strategies exist for its repair or regeneration. To address this, animal models have been developed to translate new treatment strategies toward the clinic. However, there is not yet a regulatory document guiding such studies. The purpose of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on meniscus treatment methods and outcomes to define the state of the field. Public databases were queried by using search terms related to animal models and meniscus injury and/or repair over the years 1980-2015. Identified peer-reviewed manuscripts were screened by using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. One of nine reviewers read each manuscript and scored them based on whether the publication described a series of predefined study descriptors and outcome measures. Additional data were extracted to identify common assays used. A total of 128 full-length peer-reviewed manuscripts were identified. The number of publications increased over the time frame analyzed, with 48% focused on augmented repair. Rabbit was, by far, the most prevalent species utilized (46%), with dog (21%) and sheep (20%) being the next most common. Analysis of study descriptors revealed that most studies appropriately documented details of the animal used, the surgical approach, and defect and implant characteristics (e.g., 63% of studies identified clearly the defect size). In terms of outcome parameters, most studies carried out macroscopic (85%), histologic (90%), and healing/integration (83%) analyses of the meniscus. However, many studies did not provide further analysis beyond these fundamental measures, and less than 40% reported on the adjacent cartilage and synovium, as well as joint function. There is intense interest in the field of meniscus repair. However, given the current lack of guidance documentation in this area, preclinical animal models are not performed in a standardized fashion. The development of a "Best Practices" document would increase reproducibility and external validity of experiments, while accelerating advancements in translational research. Advancement is of paramount importance given the high prevalence of meniscal injuries and the paucity of effective repair or regenerative strategies.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods

DOI

EISSN

1937-3392

ISSN

1937-3384

Publication Date

November 2017

Volume

23

Issue

11

Start / End Page

661 / 672

Related Subject Headings

  • Wound Healing
  • Species Specificity
  • Regeneration
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Menisci, Tibial
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Animals
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bansal, S., Keah, N. M., Neuwirth, A. L., O’Reilly, O., Qu, F., Seiber, B. N., … Zgonis, M. H. (2017). Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field. Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods, 23(11), 661–672. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0080
Bansal, Sonia, Niobra M. Keah, Alexander L. Neuwirth, Olivia O’Reilly, Feini Qu, Breanna N. Seiber, Sai Mandalapu, Robert L. Mauck, and Miltiadis H. Zgonis. “Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field.Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods 23, no. 11 (November 2017): 661–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0080.
Bansal S, Keah NM, Neuwirth AL, O’Reilly O, Qu F, Seiber BN, et al. Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field. Tissue engineering Part C, Methods. 2017 Nov;23(11):661–72.
Bansal, Sonia, et al. “Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field.Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods, vol. 23, no. 11, Nov. 2017, pp. 661–72. Epmc, doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0080.
Bansal S, Keah NM, Neuwirth AL, O’Reilly O, Qu F, Seiber BN, Mandalapu S, Mauck RL, Zgonis MH. Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field. Tissue engineering Part C, Methods. 2017 Nov;23(11):661–672.

Published In

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods

DOI

EISSN

1937-3392

ISSN

1937-3384

Publication Date

November 2017

Volume

23

Issue

11

Start / End Page

661 / 672

Related Subject Headings

  • Wound Healing
  • Species Specificity
  • Regeneration
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Menisci, Tibial
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Animals
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology