Revision aural atresia surgery: indications and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most common indications for revision congenital aural atresia (CAA) surgery and the postoperative healing and hearing outcomes of revision surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic otologic practice. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing revision surgery for CAA. INTERVENTION: Revision surgery for CAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indications for revision atresiaplasty, time to revision surgery, postoperative external auditory canal (EAC) patency, incidence of chronic drainage and/or infection, and postoperative speech reception thresholds (SRTs), and air-bone gaps. RESULTS: Indications for 75 ears (69 patients) undergoing 107 revision operations for CAA included 58% for EAC stenosis, 19% for chronic drainage and/or infection, and 20% for conductive hearing loss (CHL) alone. Fifty ears (67%) required a single revision. Twenty-five ears (33%) required more than 1 revision. With follow-up longer than 3 months (mean, 41 mo), 69% of ears revised for EAC stenosis achieved a patent canal (29% required >1 revision); 75% of ears revised for chronic drainage and/or infection (mean follow-up, 53 mo) realized a dry canal (22% required >1 revision). For all revision surgeries with adequate follow-up (n = 80), the mean postoperative short-term SRT of 24 dB HL was a significant improvement from the mean preoperative SRT of 39 dB HL (p < 0.01, paired t test). CONCLUSION: EAC stenosis is the most common indication for revision atresiaplasty. Despite the challenges of revision surgery, improvement in canal patency, epithelialization, and hearing utcomes can be achieved.

Duke Scholars

Author Brian Bishop Hughley Head & Neck Surgical Oncology