Skip to main content

Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Slatore, CG; Golden, SE; Schweiger, L; Ilea, I; Sullivan, DR; Rice, SPM; Wiener, RS; Datta, S; Davis, JM; Melzer, AC
Published in: Chest
March 2025

BACKGROUND: Many organizations recommend clinicians use structured communication processes, referred to as shared decision-making, to improve patient-reported outcomes for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS). RESEARCH QUESTION: Which components of high-quality patient-centered communication are associated with decision regret and distress? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, repeated measures cohort study among patients undergoing LCS in three different health care systems. We surveyed participants using validated measures of decision regret, decision satisfaction, distress, and patient-clinician communication domains up to 1 year after the low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging for LCS. For longitudinal analyses, we applied a series of generalized estimating equations to measure the association of the patient as person communication domain, screening knowledge, and decision concordance with decision regret and distress. RESULTS: When assessed 2 to 4 weeks after the LDCT imaging, 202 respondents (58.9%) and eight respondents (2.3%) of 343 total respondents reported mild and moderate or severe decision regret, respectively, whereas 29 respondents (9.2%) of 315 total respondents reported mild distress and 19 respondents (6.0%) reported moderate or greater distress. The mean ± SD decision satisfaction scores (scale, 0-10) were 9.82 ± 0.89, 9.08 ± 1.54, and 6.13 ± 3.40 among those with no, mild, and moderate or severe regret, respectively. Distress scores remained low after the LDCT imaging, even among those with nodules. Patient-centered communication domains were not associated with decision regret or distress. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that patients undergoing LCS rarely experience moderate or greater decision regret and distress. Although many participants reported mild decision regret, most were very satisfied over the 1 year after LDCT imaging for LCS. Communication processes were not associated with regret and distress, suggesting that it may be challenging for communication interventions to reduce the harms of LCS.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Chest

DOI

EISSN

1931-3543

Publication Date

March 2025

Volume

167

Issue

3

Start / End Page

876 / 891

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Respiratory System
  • Prospective Studies
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Longitudinal Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Slatore, C. G., Golden, S. E., Schweiger, L., Ilea, I., Sullivan, D. R., Rice, S. P. M., … Melzer, A. C. (2025). Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening. Chest, 167(3), 876–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817
Slatore, Christopher G., Sara E. Golden, Liana Schweiger, Ian Ilea, Donald R. Sullivan, Sean P. M. Rice, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Santanu Datta, James M. Davis, and Anne C. Melzer. “Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.Chest 167, no. 3 (March 2025): 876–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817.
Slatore CG, Golden SE, Schweiger L, Ilea I, Sullivan DR, Rice SPM, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening. Chest. 2025 Mar;167(3):876–91.
Slatore, Christopher G., et al. “Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.Chest, vol. 167, no. 3, Mar. 2025, pp. 876–91. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817.
Slatore CG, Golden SE, Schweiger L, Ilea I, Sullivan DR, Rice SPM, Wiener RS, Datta S, Davis JM, Melzer AC. Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening. Chest. 2025 Mar;167(3):876–891.

Published In

Chest

DOI

EISSN

1931-3543

Publication Date

March 2025

Volume

167

Issue

3

Start / End Page

876 / 891

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Respiratory System
  • Prospective Studies
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Longitudinal Studies