Skip to main content

Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fleischmann, D; Mastrodicasa, D; Willemink, MJ; Turner, VL; Hinostroza, V; Burris, NS; Yang, B; Hanneman, K; Ouzounian, M; Ocazionez Trujillo, D ...
Published in: Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
February 2025

Risk stratification is highly desirable in patients with uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection but inadequately supported by evidence. We sought to validate externally a published prediction model for late adverse events (LAEs), consisting of 1 clinical (connective tissue disease) and 4 imaging variables: maximum aortic diameter, false lumen circumferential angle, false lumen outflow, and number of identifiable intercostal arteries.We assembled a retrospective multicenter cohort (ROADMAP [Registry of Aortic Diseases to Model Adverse Events and Progression]) of 401 patients with uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection presenting to 1 of 8 aortic centers between 2001 and 2013, followed until 2020. LAEs were defined as fatal or nonfatal aortic rupture, new refractory hypertension or pain, organ or limb ischemia, aortic aneurysm formation (≥6 cm), or rapid growth (≥1 cm per year). We applied the original model parameters to the validation cohort and examined the effect on risk categorization using LAE end points.One hundred and seventy-six patients (44%) with incomplete imaging or clinical data were excluded. Of 225 patients in the final cohort, 90 (40%) developed LAEs, predominantly driven by aneurysm formation. Baseline maximum aortic diameter was significantly larger in patients with (42.6 [95% CI, 39.1-45.8] mm) compared with patients without LAEs (39.9 [95% CI, 36.3-44.2] mm; P=0.001). A multivariable Cox regression model indicated that only maximum diameter was associated with LAEs (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.03-1.11] per mm; P<0.001), while the other parameters were not (P>0.05). Applying the original prediction model to the validation cohort resulted in a poor 5-year sensitivity (38%) and specificity (69%).A clinical and imaging-based prediction model performed poorly in the ROADMAP cohort. Maximum aortic diameter remains the strongest predictor of LAEs in uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection.

Published In

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging

DOI

EISSN

1942-0080

ISSN

1941-9651

Publication Date

February 2025

Volume

18

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e016766

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Registries
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fleischmann, D., Mastrodicasa, D., Willemink, M. J., Turner, V. L., Hinostroza, V., Burris, N. S., … Miller, D. C. (2025). Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging, 18(2), e016766. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.124.016766
Fleischmann, Dominik, Domenico Mastrodicasa, Martin J. Willemink, Valery L. Turner, Virginia Hinostroza, Nicholas S. Burris, Bo Yang, et al. “Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 18, no. 2 (February 2025): e016766. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.124.016766.
Fleischmann D, Mastrodicasa D, Willemink MJ, Turner VL, Hinostroza V, Burris NS, et al. Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2025 Feb;18(2):e016766.
Fleischmann, Dominik, et al. “Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 18, no. 2, Feb. 2025, p. e016766. Epmc, doi:10.1161/circimaging.124.016766.
Fleischmann D, Mastrodicasa D, Willemink MJ, Turner VL, Hinostroza V, Burris NS, Yang B, Hanneman K, Ouzounian M, Ocazionez Trujillo D, Afifi RO, Estrera AL, Lacomis JM, Sultan I, Gleason TG, Pacini D, Folesani G, Lovato L, Stillman AE, De Cecco CN, Chen EP, Hinzpeter R, Alkadhi H, Hedgire S, Sundt TM, van Kuijk SMJ, Schurink GWH, Chin AS, Codari M, Sailer AM, Mistelbauer G, Madani MH, Bäumler K, Shen J, Lai KM, Fischbein MP, Miller DC. Predicting Late Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: Results From the ROADMAP Validation Study. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2025 Feb;18(2):e016766.

Published In

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging

DOI

EISSN

1942-0080

ISSN

1941-9651

Publication Date

February 2025

Volume

18

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e016766

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Registries
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans