Skip to main content

Technical Optimization of SyntheticMR for the Head and Neck on a 3T MR-Simulator and 1.5T MR-Linac: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a Technology Innovation Report.

Publication ,  Journal Article
McCullum, L; Mulder, SL; West, NA; Scott, H; Rojas, DC; Belal, Z; Dede, C; Floyd, W; Ali, AMS; Mohamed, ASR; Dresner, A; Subashi, E; Ma, D ...
Published in: medRxiv
April 10, 2025

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to optimize the technical tradeoffs associated with integrating the quantitative maps available from SyntheticMR into the head and neck adaptive radiation oncology workflow. Recent work has begun to investigate SyntheticMR in the adaptive radiation oncology workflow, however no studies have investigated the variation in acquisition parameters and their relationship to the resulting quantitative maps. Filling this gap will facilitate SyntheticMR's translation to the adaptive radiation therapy setting in the head and neck due to the reduced bias and increase repeatability and reproducibility of its generated quantitative relaxometric biomarkers. APPROACH: The 2D multi-echo multi-delay (MDME) sequence offered from SyntheticMR was acquired on a MR-Simulation and MR-Linac device in both a phantom and healthy volunteers. Scans were optimized across acceleration factors, slice gaps, acquired voxel sizes, repetition times, echo times, refocusing flip angles, noise-limited gradients, number of slices, and echo train lengths. Quantitative relaxometric T1, T2, and PD maps were tested for accuracy using both correlation and mean absolute bias analysis. Noise profiles were evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CoV) in uniform regions of interest. MAIN RESULTS: The following main findings were reported: (1) noise-limited gradients did not affect the bias or CoV, (2) increasing acceleration factor did not affect bias, but it significantly increased CoV, (3) increasing the number of slices resulted in different significant changes in the quantitative parameters between the MR-Simulator and MR-Linac, (4) reducing the echo train length led to generally reduced bias and CoV, and (5) the repeatability CoV was within previously reported literature values on similar scanners. SIGNIFICANCE: The behavior of the 2D-MDME sequence from SyntheticMR was characterized across a wide range of acquisition parameters designed for ideal head and neck imaging on both the MR-Simulation and MR-Linac devices in phantom and healthy volunteers. Significant differences existed across several acquisition parameters which should be accounted for when making adjustments for application-specific field-of-views, scan time, and desired ranges of T1, T2, and PD. Application of these findings to the development of efficient head and neck adaptive radiation therapy MRI protocols can enrich the current quantitative biomarker landscape allowing for more informed treatment adaptations.

Duke Scholars

Published In

medRxiv

DOI

Publication Date

April 10, 2025

Location

United States
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
McCullum, L., Mulder, S. L., West, N. A., Scott, H., Rojas, D. C., Belal, Z., … Fuller, C. D. (2025). Technical Optimization of SyntheticMR for the Head and Neck on a 3T MR-Simulator and 1.5T MR-Linac: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a Technology Innovation Report. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.08.25325491
McCullum, Lucas, Samuel L. Mulder, Natalie A. West, Hayden Scott, Diana Carrasco Rojas, Zayne Belal, Cem Dede, et al. “Technical Optimization of SyntheticMR for the Head and Neck on a 3T MR-Simulator and 1.5T MR-Linac: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a Technology Innovation Report.MedRxiv, April 10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.08.25325491.
McCullum L, Mulder SL, West NA, Scott H, Rojas DC, Belal Z, Dede C, Floyd W, Ali AMS, Mohamed ASR, Dresner A, Subashi E, Ma D, Stafford RJ, Hwang K-P, Fuller CD. Technical Optimization of SyntheticMR for the Head and Neck on a 3T MR-Simulator and 1.5T MR-Linac: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a Technology Innovation Report. medRxiv. 2025 Apr 10;

Published In

medRxiv

DOI

Publication Date

April 10, 2025

Location

United States