Skip to main content

Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Paterson, A; Frush, DP; Donnelly, LF
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
February 2001

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether adjustments related to patient age are made in the scanning parameters that are determinants of radiation dose for helical CT of pediatric patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective investigation included all body (chest and abdomen) helical CT examinations (n = 58) of neonates, infants, and children (n = 32) referred from outside institutions for whom radiologic consultation was requested. Information recorded included tube current, kilovoltage, collimation, and pitch. Examinations were arbitrarily grouped on the basis of the individual's age: group A, 0-4 years; group B, 5-8 years; group C, 9-12 years; and group D, 13-16 years old. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent (18/58) of the CT examinations were of the chest and 69% (40/58) were of the abdomen. Sixteen percent (9/58) of the CT examinations were combined chest and abdomen. In 22% (2/9) of these combined examinations, tube current was adjusted between the chest and abdomen CT; in one (11%) of these examinations, the tube current was higher for the chest than for the abdomen portion of the CT examination. The mean tube current setting for chest was 213 mA and was 206 mA for the abdomen, with no evident adjustment in tube current based on the age of the patient. Fifty-six percent of the examinations of neonates, infants, or children 8 years old or younger were performed at a collimation of greater than 5 mm and 53% of these examinations were performed using a pitch of 1.0. CONCLUSION: Pediatric helical CT parameters are not adjusted on the basis of the examination type or the age of the child. In particular, these results suggest that pediatric patients may be exposed to an unnecessarily high radiation dose during body CT.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication Date

February 2001

Volume

176

Issue

2

Start / End Page

297 / 301

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Radiography, Abdominal
  • Prospective Studies
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Male
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Paterson, A., Frush, D. P., & Donnelly, L. F. (2001). Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol, 176(2), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297
Paterson, A., D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly. “Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?AJR Am J Roentgenol 176, no. 2 (February 2001): 297–301. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297.
Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb;176(2):297–301.
Paterson, A., et al. “Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 176, no. 2, Feb. 2001, pp. 297–301. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297.
Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb;176(2):297–301.

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication Date

February 2001

Volume

176

Issue

2

Start / End Page

297 / 301

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Radiography, Abdominal
  • Prospective Studies
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Male
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Female