Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Alfaro, ME; Zoller, S; Lutzoni, F
Published in: Molecular biology and evolution
February 2003

Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling has become increasingly popular in phylogenetics as a method for both estimating the maximum likelihood topology and for assessing nodal confidence. Despite the growing use of posterior probabilities, the relationship between the Bayesian measure of confidence and the most commonly used confidence measure in phylogenetics, the nonparametric bootstrap proportion, is poorly understood. We used computer simulation to investigate the behavior of three phylogenetic confidence methods: Bayesian posterior probabilities calculated via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling (BMCMC-PP), maximum likelihood bootstrap proportion (ML-BP), and maximum parsimony bootstrap proportion (MP-BP). We simulated the evolution of DNA sequence on 17-taxon topologies under 18 evolutionary scenarios and examined the performance of these methods in assigning confidence to correct monophyletic and incorrect monophyletic groups, and we examined the effects of increasing character number on support value. BMCMC-PP and ML-BP were often strongly correlated with one another but could provide substantially different estimates of support on short internodes. In contrast, BMCMC-PP correlated poorly with MP-BP across most of the simulation conditions that we examined. For a given threshold value, more correct monophyletic groups were supported by BMCMC-PP than by either ML-BP or MP-BP. When threshold values were chosen that fixed the rate of accepting incorrect monophyletic relationship as true at 5%, all three methods recovered most of the correct relationships on the simulated topologies, although BMCMC-PP and ML-BP performed better than MP-BP. BMCMC-PP was usually a less biased predictor of phylogenetic accuracy than either bootstrapping method. BMCMC-PP provided high support values for correct topological bipartitions with fewer characters than was needed for nonparametric bootstrap.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Molecular biology and evolution

DOI

EISSN

1537-1719

ISSN

0737-4038

Publication Date

February 2003

Volume

20

Issue

2

Start / End Page

255 / 266

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics as Topic
  • Phylogeny
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Models, Genetic
  • Markov Chains
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Bayes Theorem
  • 3105 Genetics
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Alfaro, M. E., Zoller, S., & Lutzoni, F. (2003). Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028
Alfaro, Michael E., Stefan Zoller, and François Lutzoni. “Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.Molecular Biology and Evolution 20, no. 2 (February 2003): 255–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg028.
Alfaro, Michael E., et al. “Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 20, no. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 255–66. Epmc, doi:10.1093/molbev/msg028.
Journal cover image

Published In

Molecular biology and evolution

DOI

EISSN

1537-1719

ISSN

0737-4038

Publication Date

February 2003

Volume

20

Issue

2

Start / End Page

255 / 266

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics as Topic
  • Phylogeny
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Models, Genetic
  • Markov Chains
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Bayes Theorem
  • 3105 Genetics
  • 3104 Evolutionary biology
  • 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology