Skip to main content

Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bushnell, CD; Johnston, DC; Goldstein, LB
Published in: Stroke
March 2001

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS) have been reported to be useful for the retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity. However, unlike the CNS, the NIHSS requires detailed neurological assessments that may not be reflected in all patient records, potentially limiting its applicability. We assessed the reliability of the retrospective algorithms and the proportions of missing items for the NIHSS and CNS in stroke patients admitted to an academic medical center (AMC) and 2 community hospitals. METHODS: Randomly selected records of patients with ischemic stroke admitted to an AMC (n=20) and community hospitals with (CH1, n=19) and without (CH2, n=20) acute neurological consultative services were reviewed. NIHSS and CNS scores were assigned independently by 2 neurologists using published algorithms. Interrater reliability of the scores was determined with the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the numbers of missing items were tabulated. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for NIHSS and CNS, respectively, were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.00) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.00) for the AMC, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.00) and 0.88 (95%, 0.73 to 1.00) for the CH1, and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.70) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.96) for the CH2. More NIHSS items were missing at the CH2 (62%) versus the AMC (27%) and the CH1 (23%, P:=0.0001). In comparison, 33%, 0%, and 8% of CNS items were missing from records from CH2, AMC, and CH1, respectively (P:=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of interrater agreement were almost perfect for retrospectively assigned NIHSS and CNS scores for patients initially evaluated by a neurologist at both an AMC and a CH. Levels of agreement for the CNS were substantial at a CH2, but interrater agreement for the NIHSS was only moderate in this setting. The proportions of missing items are higher for the NIHSS than the CNS in each setting, particularly limiting its application in the hospital without acute neurological consultative services.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Stroke

DOI

EISSN

1524-4628

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

32

Issue

3

Start / End Page

656 / 660

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Stroke
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Observer Variation
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bushnell, C. D., Johnston, D. C., & Goldstein, L. B. (2001). Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke, 32(3), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.3.656
Bushnell, C. D., D. C. Johnston, and L. B. Goldstein. “Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale.Stroke 32, no. 3 (March 2001): 656–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.3.656.
Bushnell, C. D., et al. “Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale.Stroke, vol. 32, no. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 656–60. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/01.str.32.3.656.

Published In

Stroke

DOI

EISSN

1524-4628

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

32

Issue

3

Start / End Page

656 / 660

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Stroke
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Observer Variation
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Male