Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Clinical and biochemical presentation of gouty diathesis: comparison of uric acid versus pure calcium stone formation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Khatchadourian, J; Preminger, GM; Whitson, PA; Adams-Huet, B; Pak, CY
Published in: J Urol
November 1995

PURPOSE: We compared gouty diathesis with uric acid versus calcium stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and laboratory data from 95 gouty diathesis patients (28 with uric acid and 67 with calcium stones) and 99 normal subjects. RESULTS: Of the gouty diathesis patients gouty arthritis was present in 21% of those with uric acid and 12% of those with calcium stones. Hyperuricemia developed in 43% of those with uric acid and 27% of those with calcium stones, and 2% of controls. Urinary pH was independent of the net gastrointestinal absorption of alkali in the gouty diathesis groups. Urinary pH and citrate increased after potassium citrate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristic features of primary gout were present in both gouty diathesis groups and both are responsive to treatment.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Urol

DOI

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication Date

November 1995

Volume

154

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1665 / 1669

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Uric Acid
  • Sex Distribution
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Intestinal Absorption
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Khatchadourian, J., Preminger, G. M., Whitson, P. A., Adams-Huet, B., & Pak, C. Y. (1995). Clinical and biochemical presentation of gouty diathesis: comparison of uric acid versus pure calcium stone formation. J Urol, 154(5), 1665–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66743-0
Khatchadourian, J., G. M. Preminger, P. A. Whitson, B. Adams-Huet, and C. Y. Pak. “Clinical and biochemical presentation of gouty diathesis: comparison of uric acid versus pure calcium stone formation.J Urol 154, no. 5 (November 1995): 1665–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66743-0.
Khatchadourian J, Preminger GM, Whitson PA, Adams-Huet B, Pak CY. Clinical and biochemical presentation of gouty diathesis: comparison of uric acid versus pure calcium stone formation. J Urol. 1995 Nov;154(5):1665–9.
Khatchadourian, J., et al. “Clinical and biochemical presentation of gouty diathesis: comparison of uric acid versus pure calcium stone formation.J Urol, vol. 154, no. 5, Nov. 1995, pp. 1665–69. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66743-0.
Khatchadourian J, Preminger GM, Whitson PA, Adams-Huet B, Pak CY. Clinical and biochemical presentation of gouty diathesis: comparison of uric acid versus pure calcium stone formation. J Urol. 1995 Nov;154(5):1665–1669.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Urol

DOI

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication Date

November 1995

Volume

154

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1665 / 1669

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Uric Acid
  • Sex Distribution
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Intestinal Absorption
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Humans