Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Solomon, DH; Simel, DL; Bates, DW; Katz, JN; Schaffer, JL
Published in: JAMA
October 3, 2001

CONTEXT: While most meniscal or ligamentous knee injuries heal with nonoperative treatments, a subset should be treated with arthroscopic or open surgery. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the accuracy of the clinical examination for meniscal or ligamentous knee injuries. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-December 31, 2000) and HealthSTAR (1975-December 31, 2000) databases were searched for English-language articles describing the diagnostic accuracy of individual examination items for the knee and a combination of physical examination items (composite examination). Other data sources included reference lists from relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION: Studies selected for data extraction were those that compared the performance of the physical examination of the knee with a reference standard, such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy, or magnetic resonance imaging. Eighty-eight articles were identified, of which 23 (26%) met inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: A rheumatologist and an orthopedic surgeon independently reviewed each article using a standardized rating scale that scored the assembly of the study, the relevance of the patients enrolled, the appropriateness of the reference standard, and the blinding of the examiner. DATA SYNTHESIS: Summary likelihood ratios (LRs) were estimated from random effects models. The summary LRs for physical examination for tears of the anterior cruciate ligament, using the anterior drawer test, were 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-22.0) for a positive examination and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.05-1.50) for a negative examination; the Lachman test, 25.0 (95% CI, 2.7-651.0) and 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0-0.4); and the composite assessment, 25.0 (95% CI, 2.1-306.0) and 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.48), respectively. The LRs could not be generated for any specific examination maneuver for a posterior cruciate ligament tear, but the composite assessment had an LR of 21.0 (95% CI, 2.1-205.0) for a positive examination and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.50) for a negative examination. Determination of meniscal lesions, using McMurray test, had an LR of 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-1.7) for a positive examination and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6-1.1) for a negative examination; joint line tenderness, 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.0) and 1.1 (95% CI, 1.0-1.3); and the composite assessment, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.4-5.1) and 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: The composite examination for specific meniscal or ligamentous injuries of the knee performed much better than specific maneuvers, suggesting that synthesis of a group of examination maneuvers and historical items may be required for adequate diagnosis.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JAMA

DOI

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication Date

October 3, 2001

Volume

286

Issue

13

Start / End Page

1610 / 1620

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Posterior Cruciate Ligament
  • Physical Examination
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Ligaments, Articular
  • Knee Injuries
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Clinical Competence
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Solomon, D. H., Simel, D. L., Bates, D. W., Katz, J. N., & Schaffer, J. L. (2001). The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA, 286(13), 1610–1620. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.13.1610
Solomon, D. H., D. L. Simel, D. W. Bates, J. N. Katz, and J. L. Schaffer. “The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination.JAMA 286, no. 13 (October 3, 2001): 1610–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.13.1610.
Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, Katz JN, Schaffer JL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA. 2001 Oct 3;286(13):1610–20.
Solomon, D. H., et al. “The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination.JAMA, vol. 286, no. 13, Oct. 2001, pp. 1610–20. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/jama.286.13.1610.
Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, Katz JN, Schaffer JL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA. 2001 Oct 3;286(13):1610–1620.
Journal cover image

Published In

JAMA

DOI

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication Date

October 3, 2001

Volume

286

Issue

13

Start / End Page

1610 / 1620

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Posterior Cruciate Ligament
  • Physical Examination
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Ligaments, Articular
  • Knee Injuries
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Clinical Competence