Skip to main content

Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mahaffey, KW; Harrington, RA; Akkerhuis, M; Kleiman, NS; Berdan, LG; Crenshaw, BS; Tardiff, BE; Granger, CB; DeJong, I; Bhapkar, M; Widimsky, P ...
Published in: Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med
July 17, 2001

BACKGROUND: Clinical events committees (CEC) are used routinely to adjudicate suspected end-points in cardiovascular trials, but little information has been published about the various processes used. We reviewed results of the CEC process used to identify and adjudicate suspected end-point (post-enrolment) myocardial infarction (MI) in the large Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial. METHODS: The PURSUIT trial randomised 10,948 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive eptifibatide or placebo. A central adjudication process was established prospectively to identify all suspected MIs and adjudicate events based on protocol definitions of MI. Suspected MIs were identified by systematic review of data collection forms, cardiac enzyme results, and electrocardiograms. Two physicians independently reviewed all suspected events. If they disagreed whether a MI had occurred, a committee of cardiologists adjudicated the case. RESULTS: The CEC identified 5005 patients with suspected infarction (46%), of which 1415 (28%) were adjudicated as end-point infarctions. As expected, the process identified more end-point events than did the site investigators. Absolute and relative treatment effects of eptifibatide were smaller when using CEC-determined MI rates rather than site investigator-determined rates. The site-investigator reporting of MI and the CEC assessment of MI disagreed in 20% of the cases reviewed by the CEC. CONCLUSIONS: End-point adjudication by a CEC is important, to provide standardised, systematic, independent, and unbiased assessment of end-points, particularly in trials that span geographic regions and clinical practice settings. Understanding the CEC process used is important in the interpretation of trial results and event rates.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med

DOI

ISSN

1468-6708

Publication Date

July 17, 2001

Volume

2

Issue

4

Start / End Page

180 / 186

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mahaffey, K. W., Harrington, R. A., Akkerhuis, M., Kleiman, N. S., Berdan, L. G., Crenshaw, B. S., … For the PURSUIT Investigators, . (2001). Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med, 2(4), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-180
Mahaffey, Kenneth W., Robert A. Harrington, Martijn Akkerhuis, Neal S. Kleiman, Lisa G. Berdan, Brian S. Crenshaw, Barbara E. Tardiff, et al. “Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial.Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2, no. 4 (July 17, 2001): 180–86. https://doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-180.
Mahaffey KW, Harrington RA, Akkerhuis M, Kleiman NS, Berdan LG, Crenshaw BS, et al. Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001 Jul 17;2(4):180–6.
Mahaffey, Kenneth W., et al. “Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial.Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med, vol. 2, no. 4, July 2001, pp. 180–86. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/cvm-2-4-180.
Mahaffey KW, Harrington RA, Akkerhuis M, Kleiman NS, Berdan LG, Crenshaw BS, Tardiff BE, Granger CB, DeJong I, Bhapkar M, Widimsky P, Corbalon R, Lee KL, Deckers JW, Simoons ML, Topol EJ, Califf RM, For the PURSUIT Investigators. Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001 Jul 17;2(4):180–186.

Published In

Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med

DOI

ISSN

1468-6708

Publication Date

July 17, 2001

Volume

2

Issue

4

Start / End Page

180 / 186

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology