Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Oates, CT; Sloane, R; Ingram, SS; Seo, PH; Cohen, HJ; Clipp, EC
Published in: Psychooncology
July 2007

This study examines extent of agreement between oncologists' and cancer patients' reports of current cancer status. Participants with history of cancer were given a comprehensive geriatric assessment in which they were asked whether they had cancer at the present time. This was compared to cancer status concurrently recorded by their physicians in the chart. 75.5% of patients whose physicians reported 'no evidence of disease' (NED) reported that they currently had cancer. 30% of them were anxious and 27% were depressed. Among patients for whom both the patient and physician reported no cancer, only 12.5% were anxious and 7% depressed. Compared to patients with concordant responses, those who discrepantly reported they had cancer had significantly more comorbid illnesses, medications, and pain, and lower levels of social, emotional, and physical functioning. Moreover, equal levels of distress and dysfunction were found between those who reported cancer but had NED and those who reported cancer and did have active disease by physician notation. Although conclusions about cause and effect are limited due to study design, findings suggest that some patients might suffer unnecessarily from lack of understanding about current disease status. These findings also suggest the need for improved physician-patient communication and symptom recognition/management.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Psychooncology

DOI

ISSN

1057-9249

Publication Date

July 2007

Volume

16

Issue

7

Start / End Page

668 / 675

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Veterans
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sick Role
  • Self Disclosure
  • Quality of Life
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Personality Inventory
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • North Carolina
  • Neoplasms
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Oates, C. T., Sloane, R., Ingram, S. S., Seo, P. H., Cohen, H. J., & Clipp, E. C. (2007). Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status. Psychooncology, 16(7), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1127
Oates, Carolyn T., Richard Sloane, Sally S. Ingram, Pearl H. Seo, Harvey J. Cohen, and Elizabeth C. Clipp. “Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status.Psychooncology 16, no. 7 (July 2007): 668–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1127.
Oates CT, Sloane R, Ingram SS, Seo PH, Cohen HJ, Clipp EC. Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status. Psychooncology. 2007 Jul;16(7):668–75.
Oates, Carolyn T., et al. “Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status.Psychooncology, vol. 16, no. 7, July 2007, pp. 668–75. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/pon.1127.
Oates CT, Sloane R, Ingram SS, Seo PH, Cohen HJ, Clipp EC. Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status. Psychooncology. 2007 Jul;16(7):668–675.
Journal cover image

Published In

Psychooncology

DOI

ISSN

1057-9249

Publication Date

July 2007

Volume

16

Issue

7

Start / End Page

668 / 675

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Veterans
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sick Role
  • Self Disclosure
  • Quality of Life
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Personality Inventory
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • North Carolina
  • Neoplasms