Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE initiative.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Singh, KP; Roe, MT; Peterson, ED; Chen, AY; Mahaffey, KW; Goodman, SG; Harrington, RA; Smith, SC; Gibler, WB; Ohman, EM; Pollack, CV ...
Published in: J Thromb Thrombolysis
June 2006

BACKGROUND: Both heparin and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy and early invasive management strategies are recommended by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). However, controversy exists about which form of heparin-unfractionated (UF) or low-molecular-weight (LMW)-is preferable. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of these treatment strategies in a large contemporary population of patients with NSTE ACS. METHODS: Using data from the CRUSADE Initiative, we evaluated LMWH and UFH in high-risk NSTE ACS patients (positive cardiac markers and/or ischemic ST-segment changes) who had received early (< 24 hours) GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy and underwent early invasive management. In-hospital outcomes were compared among treatment groups. RESULTS: From a total of 11,358 patients treated at 407 hospitals in the US from January 2002-June 2003, 6881 (60.6%) received UFH and 4477 (39.4%) received LMWH. Patients treated with UFH were more often admitted to a cardiology inpatient service (73.6% vs. 65.5%, P < 0.0001) and more frequently underwent diagnostic catheterization (91.8% vs. 85.9%, P < 0.0001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (69.7% vs. 56.9%, P < 0.0001) than patients treated with LMWH. The point estimate of the adjusted risk of in-hospital death or reinfarction was slightly lower among patients treated with LMWH (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.99) and the risk of red blood cell transfusion was similar (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89-1.15). Among patients who underwent PCI within 48 hours, adjusted rates of death (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.71-1.85), death or reinfarction (OR 0.93, 0.67-1.31), and transfusion (OR 1.16, 0.89-1.50) were similar. Patients who underwent PCI more than 48 hours into hospitalization had reduced rates of death (OR 0.64, 0.46-0.88), death or reinfarction (OR 0.57, 0.44-0.73), and transfusion (OR 0.66, 0.52-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have slightly improved outcomes and similar bleeding risks with LMWH than with UFH. These findings are consistent with current ACC/AHA guidelines but raise important questions about the safety and effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy in real-world clinical practice. Using data from the CRUSADE Initiative, we evaluated low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) who received early (<24 hours) glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and early invasive management. In-hospital outcomes were compared among treatment groups. LMWH was associated with slightly improved clinical outcomes and similar rates of transfusion compared with UFH. Our results support the current ACC/AHA guidelines recommendations but raise concerns about the safety and efficacy of UFH in the setting of background use of upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for patients with NSTE ACS in routine clinical practice.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Thromb Thrombolysis

DOI

ISSN

0929-5305

Publication Date

June 2006

Volume

21

Issue

3

Start / End Page

211 / 220

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
  • Heparin
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Singh, K. P., Roe, M. T., Peterson, E. D., Chen, A. Y., Mahaffey, K. W., Goodman, S. G., … CRUSADE Investigators, . (2006). Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE initiative. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 21(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-006-5708-0
Singh, Kanwar P., Matthew T. Roe, Eric D. Peterson, Anita Y. Chen, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Shaun G. Goodman, Robert A. Harrington, et al. “Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE initiative.J Thromb Thrombolysis 21, no. 3 (June 2006): 211–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-006-5708-0.
Singh KP, Roe MT, Peterson ED, Chen AY, Mahaffey KW, Goodman SG, Harrington RA, Smith SC, Gibler WB, Ohman EM, Pollack CV, CRUSADE Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: results from the CRUSADE initiative. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006 Jun;21(3):211–220.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Thromb Thrombolysis

DOI

ISSN

0929-5305

Publication Date

June 2006

Volume

21

Issue

3

Start / End Page

211 / 220

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Myocardial Revascularization
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
  • Heparin