Skip to main content

Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sakuma, T; Hattori, T; Deshusses, MA
Published in: Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)
November 2006

Four different biofilter packing materials (two porous ceramics, perlite, and open pore polyurethane foam) were compared for the removal of toluene vapors. The focus was on evaluating performance at relatively short gas retention time (13.5 and 27 sec). The reactors were initially operated as biotrickling filters with continuous feeding and trickling of a nutrient solution. After significant plugging of the biotrickling filter beds with biomass was observed, the operation mode was switched to biofiltration with only periodic supply of mineral nutrients. This resulted in stable conditions, which allowed detailed investigations over > 6 months. The reactor packed with cattle bone Porcelite (CBP), a ceramic material containing some macronutrients and micronutrients, exhibited the highest performance. The critical load (i.e., load at which 95% removal occurred) was 29 g m(-3) hr(-1) at a gas retention time of 13.5 sec and 66 g m(-3) hr(-1) at a gas retention time of 27 sec. After the long-term experiment, the packing materials were taken from the reactors and examined. The reactors were divided into three sections, top, middle, and bottom, to determine whether spatial differentiation of biomass occurred. The assays included a double-staining technique to count total and live microorganisms and determination of moisture, protein, and dry weight contents. Microbial community analysis was also conducted by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. The results showed that most reactors had a significant fraction of inactive biomass. Comparatively, the CBP biofilter held significantly higher densities of active biomass, which may be the reason for the higher toluene removal performance. The analyses suggest that favorable material properties and the nutrients slowly released by the CBP provided better environmental conditions for the process culture.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)

DOI

EISSN

2162-2906

ISSN

1096-2247

Publication Date

November 2006

Volume

56

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1567 / 1575

Related Subject Headings

  • Toluene
  • Product Packaging
  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
  • Filtration
  • Biomass
  • Biofilms
  • Biodegradation, Environmental
  • Bacterial Physiological Phenomena
  • Air Pollution
  • Air Pollutants
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sakuma, T., Hattori, T., & Deshusses, M. A. (2006). Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), 56(11), 1567–1575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464564
Sakuma, Takeyuki, Toshihiro Hattori, and Marc A. Deshusses. “Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) 56, no. 11 (November 2006): 1567–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464564.
Sakuma T, Hattori T, Deshusses MA. Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995). 2006 Nov;56(11):1567–75.
Sakuma, Takeyuki, et al. “Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), vol. 56, no. 11, Nov. 2006, pp. 1567–75. Epmc, doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464564.
Sakuma T, Hattori T, Deshusses MA. Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995). 2006 Nov;56(11):1567–1575.

Published In

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)

DOI

EISSN

2162-2906

ISSN

1096-2247

Publication Date

November 2006

Volume

56

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1567 / 1575

Related Subject Headings

  • Toluene
  • Product Packaging
  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
  • Filtration
  • Biomass
  • Biofilms
  • Biodegradation, Environmental
  • Bacterial Physiological Phenomena
  • Air Pollution
  • Air Pollutants