Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction and serology for screening umbilical cord blood components.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Roback, JD; Caliendo, AM; Newman, JL; Sgan, SL; Saakadze, N; Gillespie, TW; Lane, TA; Kurtzberg, J; Hillyer, CD
Published in: Transfusion
November 2005

BACKGROUND: Recipients of umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplants are susceptible to opportunistic infections, including cytomegalovirus (CMV). To prevent CMV transmission from UCB donors, most laboratories perform serology on corresponding maternal samples and quarantine units when the mother has immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-CMV. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: UCB units and associated samples (UCB plasma and red cell pellet; maternal whole blood and serum) from two cord blood banks were tested with two validated CMV polymerase chain reaction assays (UL54 and UL93 targets). Results were compared with maternal CMV serology (IgG and IgM). RESULTS: Only 4 of 48 (8.3%) quarantined CMV IgM-positive units were also CMV nucleic acid testing (NAT)-positive (651-68,600 copies/mL). In contrast, 1 of 200 "CMV-safe" UCB units (CMV IgM-equivocal or -negative) had CMV DNA (0.5%). The corresponding maternal samples were CMV NAT-negative. Positive maternal IgM serology demonstrates only modest sensitivity (80%) and specificity (82%) and poor positive predictive value (8%), when correlated with the presence of CMV DNA in UCB units. CONCLUSION: CMV NAT may be a useful adjunct to serologic screening, potentially reducing wastage of IgM-positive and NAT-negative units while also detecting potentially infectious units that would pass serologic screening. A prospective clinical trial to further evaluate the role of CMV NAT in UCB transplantation appears warranted.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Transfusion

DOI

ISSN

0041-1132

Publication Date

November 2005

Volume

45

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1722 / 1728

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Viremia
  • Serologic Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Pregnancy
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Immunoglobulin M
  • Humans
  • Fetal Blood
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Roback, J. D., Caliendo, A. M., Newman, J. L., Sgan, S. L., Saakadze, N., Gillespie, T. W., … Hillyer, C. D. (2005). Comparison of cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction and serology for screening umbilical cord blood components. Transfusion, 45(11), 1722–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00596.x
Roback, John D., Angela M. Caliendo, James L. Newman, Stephen L. Sgan, Natia Saakadze, Theresa W. Gillespie, Thomas A. Lane, Joanne Kurtzberg, and Christopher D. Hillyer. “Comparison of cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction and serology for screening umbilical cord blood components.Transfusion 45, no. 11 (November 2005): 1722–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00596.x.
Roback JD, Caliendo AM, Newman JL, Sgan SL, Saakadze N, Gillespie TW, et al. Comparison of cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction and serology for screening umbilical cord blood components. Transfusion. 2005 Nov;45(11):1722–8.
Roback, John D., et al. “Comparison of cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction and serology for screening umbilical cord blood components.Transfusion, vol. 45, no. 11, Nov. 2005, pp. 1722–28. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00596.x.
Roback JD, Caliendo AM, Newman JL, Sgan SL, Saakadze N, Gillespie TW, Lane TA, Kurtzberg J, Hillyer CD. Comparison of cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction and serology for screening umbilical cord blood components. Transfusion. 2005 Nov;45(11):1722–1728.
Journal cover image

Published In

Transfusion

DOI

ISSN

0041-1132

Publication Date

November 2005

Volume

45

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1722 / 1728

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Viremia
  • Serologic Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Pregnancy
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Immunoglobulin M
  • Humans
  • Fetal Blood
  • Female