Skip to main content

Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Patz, EF; Connolly, J; Herndon, J
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
March 2000

OBJECTIVE: We determined the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for patients with treated lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined patients who underwent FDG PET after first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. FDG PET results were correlated with survival rates to determine whether FDG PET findings were predictive of outcomes. RESULTS: After initial therapy, 113 patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent FDG PET. One hundred patients had positive FDG PET results and a median survival of 12 months (95% confidence interval, 9.2-15.4). Thirteen patients had negative FDG PET results, and 11 (85%) of these patients are still living at a median follow-up of 34 months. The difference in survival for patients with positive and negative FDG PET results was statistically significant (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: FDG PET has prognostic value and strongly correlates with survival rates of patients with treated lung cancer. Patients with positive FDG PET results have a significantly worse prognosis than patients with negative results. Additionally, FDG PET may be helpful in guiding therapeutic treatments.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication Date

March 2000

Volume

174

Issue

3

Start / End Page

769 / 774

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tomography, Emission-Computed
  • Survival Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Patz, E. F., Connolly, J., & Herndon, J. (2000). Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 174(3), 769–774. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740769
Patz, E. F., J. Connolly, and J. Herndon. “Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol 174, no. 3 (March 2000): 769–74. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740769.
Patz EF, Connolly J, Herndon J. Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Mar;174(3):769–74.
Patz, E. F., et al. “Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 174, no. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 769–74. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740769.
Patz EF, Connolly J, Herndon J. Prognostic value of thoracic FDG PET imaging after treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Mar;174(3):769–774.

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication Date

March 2000

Volume

174

Issue

3

Start / End Page

769 / 774

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tomography, Emission-Computed
  • Survival Rate
  • Prognosis
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans