Skip to main content

BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hong, AS; Rosen, EL; Soo, MS; Baker, JA
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
April 2005

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of features described in the new sonographic BI-RADS lexicon for evaluating solid masses with known histologic diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sonograms of 403 solid lesions were analyzed by one of three dedicated breast radiologists. Each lesion was described using features from the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Lesion description and biopsy results were correlated. PPV and NPV were calculated. RESULTS: Histologic results showed that 141 (35%) of 403 masses were malignant. Sonographic BI-RADS descriptors showing high predictive value for malignancy include spiculated margin (86%, 19/22), irregular shape (62%, 102/164), and nonparallel orientation (69%, 75/109). Sonographic BI-RADS descriptors highly predictive of benign lesions include circumscribed margin (90%, 160/178), parallel orientation (78%, 228/294), and oval shape (84%, 200/237). For the sonographic BI-RADS features of mass margin, shape, orientation, lesion boundary, echo pattern, and posterior acoustic features, descriptors chosen were significantly (p < 0.001) different for malignant and benign masses. CONCLUSION: Descriptors from the new sonographic BI-RADS lexicon can be useful in differentiating benign from malignant solid masses.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication Date

April 2005

Volume

184

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1260 / 1265

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Mammary
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Mammography
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Chi-Square Distribution
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hong, A. S., Rosen, E. L., Soo, M. S., & Baker, J. A. (2005). BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 184(4), 1260–1265. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.4.01841260
Hong, Andrea S., Eric L. Rosen, Mary S. Soo, and Jay A. Baker. “BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.AJR Am J Roentgenol 184, no. 4 (April 2005): 1260–65. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.4.01841260.
Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1260–5.
Hong, Andrea S., et al. “BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 184, no. 4, Apr. 2005, pp. 1260–65. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/ajr.184.4.01841260.
Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1260–1265.

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

ISSN

0361-803X

Publication Date

April 2005

Volume

184

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1260 / 1265

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Mammary
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Mammography
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Chi-Square Distribution