Skip to main content

Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Zayats, T; Young, TL; Mackey, DA; Malecaze, F; Calvas, P; Guggenheim, JA
Published in: PLoS One
July 7, 2009

BACKGROUND: A cost effective, safe and efficient method of obtaining DNA samples is essential in large scale genetic analyses. Buccal cells are an attractive source of DNA, as their collection is non-invasive and can be carried out by mail. However, little attention has been given to the quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes. METHODOLOGY: Mouthwash-derived DNA was extracted from 500 subjects participating in a genetic study of high myopia. DNA quality was investigated using two standard techniques: agarose gel electrophoresis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Whereas the majority of mouthwash-derived DNA samples showed a single band of high molecular weight DNA by gel electrophoresis, 8.9% (95% CI: 7.1-10.7%) of samples contained only a smear of low-to-medium molecular weight, degraded DNA. The odds of DNA degradation in a subject's second mouthwash sample, given degradation of the first, was significantly greater than one (OR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.22-7.39; Fisher's test P = 0.009), suggesting that DNA degradation was at least partially a subject-specific phenomenon. Approximately 12.4% (95% CI: 10.4-14.4%) of mouthwash-derived DNA failed to PCR amplify efficiently (using an approximately 200 bp microsatellite marker). However, we found there was no significant difference in amplification success rate between DNA samples judged to be degraded or non-degraded by gel electrophoresis (Fisher's test P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that DNA degradation affects a significant minority of saline mouthwashes, and that the phenomenon is partially subject-specific. Whilst the level of degradation did not significantly prevent successful amplification of short PCR fragments, previous studies suggest that such DNA degradation would compromise more demanding applications.

Duke Scholars

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

July 7, 2009

Volume

4

Issue

7

Start / End Page

e6165

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Myopia
  • Mouthwashes
  • Humans
  • General Science & Technology
  • Electrophoresis, Agar Gel
  • DNA Primers
  • DNA
  • Base Sequence
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Zayats, T., Young, T. L., Mackey, D. A., Malecaze, F., Calvas, P., & Guggenheim, J. A. (2009). Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes. PLoS One, 4(7), e6165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006165
Zayats, Tetyana, Terri L. Young, David A. Mackey, François Malecaze, Patrick Calvas, and Jeremy A. Guggenheim. “Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.PLoS One 4, no. 7 (July 7, 2009): e6165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006165.
Zayats T, Young TL, Mackey DA, Malecaze F, Calvas P, Guggenheim JA. Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 7;4(7):e6165.
Zayats, Tetyana, et al. “Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 7, July 2009, p. e6165. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006165.
Zayats T, Young TL, Mackey DA, Malecaze F, Calvas P, Guggenheim JA. Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 7;4(7):e6165.

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

July 7, 2009

Volume

4

Issue

7

Start / End Page

e6165

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Myopia
  • Mouthwashes
  • Humans
  • General Science & Technology
  • Electrophoresis, Agar Gel
  • DNA Primers
  • DNA
  • Base Sequence