Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging.
Publication
, Journal Article
Nelson, RC; Chezmar, JL; Steinberg, HV; Torres, WE; Baumgartner, BR; Gedgaudas-McClees, RK; Bernardino, ME
Published in: Gastrointest Radiol
1988
Eighteen patients with focal hepatic lesions were evaluated with two computed tomographic (CT) techniques including dynamic sequential bolus contrast CT and delayed contrast CT, and 3 magnetic resonance (MR) techniques including a spin echo pulse sequence with TE/TR of 21/310 msec and 2 fast field echo sequences using a TE/TR of 15/300 msec and 80 degrees flip angle (T1-weighted) and TE/TR of 15/500 msec and 10-20 degrees flip angle (T2-weighted). We concluded that CT, using delayed contrast and dynamic sequential bolus contrast techniques, was consistently superior to the 3 MR pulse sequences used on our imagers in terms of number of lesions detected, lesion-to-liver contrast, and quality of scan.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Gastrointest Radiol
DOI
ISSN
0364-2356
Publication Date
1988
Volume
13
Issue
2
Start / End Page
115 / 122
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- Middle Aged
- Male
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Liver Neoplasms
- Humans
- Female
- Aged
- Adult
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Nelson, R. C., Chezmar, J. L., Steinberg, H. V., Torres, W. E., Baumgartner, B. R., Gedgaudas-McClees, R. K., & Bernardino, M. E. (1988). Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging. Gastrointest Radiol, 13(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889039
Nelson, R. C., J. L. Chezmar, H. V. Steinberg, W. E. Torres, B. R. Baumgartner, R. K. Gedgaudas-McClees, and M. E. Bernardino. “Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging.” Gastrointest Radiol 13, no. 2 (1988): 115–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889039.
Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Steinberg HV, Torres WE, Baumgartner BR, Gedgaudas-McClees RK, et al. Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging. Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;13(2):115–22.
Nelson, R. C., et al. “Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging.” Gastrointest Radiol, vol. 13, no. 2, 1988, pp. 115–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/BF01889039.
Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Steinberg HV, Torres WE, Baumgartner BR, Gedgaudas-McClees RK, Bernardino ME. Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging. Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;13(2):115–122.
Published In
Gastrointest Radiol
DOI
ISSN
0364-2356
Publication Date
1988
Volume
13
Issue
2
Start / End Page
115 / 122
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- Middle Aged
- Male
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Liver Neoplasms
- Humans
- Female
- Aged
- Adult