Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Corey, GR; Wilcox, M; Talbot, GH; Friedland, HD; Baculik, T; Witherell, GW; Critchley, I; Das, AF; Thye, D
Published in: Clin Infect Dis
September 15, 2010

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of complicated skin and skin-structure infection (cSSSI). Increasing antimicrobial resistance in cSSSI has led to a need for new safe and effective therapies. Ceftaroline was evaluated as treatment for cSSSI in 2 identical phase 3 clinical trials, the pooled analysis of which is presented here. The primary objective of each trial was to determine the noninferiority of the clinical cure rate achieved with ceftaroline monotherapy, compared with that achieved with vancomycin plus aztreonam combination therapy, in the clinically evaluable (CE) and modified intent-to-treat (MITT) patient populations. METHODS: Adult patients with cSSSI requiring intravenous therapy received ceftaroline (600 mg every 12 h) or vancomycin plus aztreonam (1 g each every 12 h) for 5-14 days. RESULTS: Of 1378 patients enrolled in both trials, 693 received ceftaroline and 685 received vancomycin plus aztreonam. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups were comparable. Clinical cure rates were similar for ceftaroline and vancomycin plus aztreonam in the CE (91.6% vs 92.7%) and MITT (85.9% vs 85.5%) populations, respectively, as well as in patients infected with MRSA (93.4% vs 94.3%). The rates of adverse events, discontinuations because of an adverse event, serious adverse events, and death also were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline achieved high clinical cure rates, was efficacious against cSSSI caused by MRSA and other common cSSSI pathogens, and was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the cephalosporin class. Ceftaroline has the potential to provide a monotherapy alternative for the treatment of cSSSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00424190 for CANVAS 1 and NCT00423657 for CANVAS 2.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Infect Dis

DOI

EISSN

1537-6591

Publication Date

September 15, 2010

Volume

51

Issue

6

Start / End Page

641 / 650

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Vancomycin
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Skin Diseases, Bacterial
  • Middle Aged
  • Microbiology
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Corey, G. R., Wilcox, M., Talbot, G. H., Friedland, H. D., Baculik, T., Witherell, G. W., … Thye, D. (2010). Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clin Infect Dis, 51(6), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/655827
Corey, G Ralph, Mark Wilcox, George H. Talbot, H David Friedland, Tanya Baculik, Gary W. Witherell, Ian Critchley, Anita F. Das, and Dirk Thye. “Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection.Clin Infect Dis 51, no. 6 (September 15, 2010): 641–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/655827.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Infect Dis

DOI

EISSN

1537-6591

Publication Date

September 15, 2010

Volume

51

Issue

6

Start / End Page

641 / 650

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Vancomycin
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Skin Diseases, Bacterial
  • Middle Aged
  • Microbiology
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug Therapy, Combination