Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wilson, BS; Finley, CC; Farmer, JC; Lawson, DT; Weber, BA; Wolford, RD; Kenan, PD; White, MW; Merzenich, MM; Schindler, RA
Published in: Laryngoscope
October 1988

A wide variety of speech processing strategies for multichannel auditory prostheses were compared in studies of two patients implanted with the UCSF electrode array. Each strategy was evaluated using tests of vowel and consonant confusions, with and without lipreading. Included among the strategies were the compressed analog processor of the present UCSF/Storz prosthesis and a group of interleaved pulses processors in which the amplitudes of nonsimultaneous pulses code the spectral variations of speech. For these patients, each with indications of poor nerve survival, test scores were significantly higher with the interleaved pulses processors. We believe this superior performance was a result of 1. the substantial release from channel interactions provided by nonsimultaneous stimuli and 2. a fast enough rotation among the channels to support adequate temporal and spectral resolution of perceived speech sounds.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Laryngoscope

DOI

ISSN

0023-852X

Publication Date

October 1988

Volume

98

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1069 / 1077

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Speech Discrimination Tests
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cochlear Implants
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Farmer, J. C., Lawson, D. T., Weber, B. A., Wolford, R. D., … Schindler, R. A. (1988). Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope, 98(10), 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198810000-00009
Wilson, B. S., C. C. Finley, J. C. Farmer, D. T. Lawson, B. A. Weber, R. D. Wolford, P. D. Kenan, M. W. White, M. M. Merzenich, and R. A. Schindler. “Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants.Laryngoscope 98, no. 10 (October 1988): 1069–77. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198810000-00009.
Wilson BS, Finley CC, Farmer JC, Lawson DT, Weber BA, Wolford RD, et al. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1069–77.
Wilson, B. S., et al. “Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants.Laryngoscope, vol. 98, no. 10, Oct. 1988, pp. 1069–77. Pubmed, doi:10.1288/00005537-198810000-00009.
Wilson BS, Finley CC, Farmer JC, Lawson DT, Weber BA, Wolford RD, Kenan PD, White MW, Merzenich MM, Schindler RA. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope. 1988 Oct;98(10):1069–1077.
Journal cover image

Published In

Laryngoscope

DOI

ISSN

0023-852X

Publication Date

October 1988

Volume

98

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1069 / 1077

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Speech Discrimination Tests
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cochlear Implants
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences