Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Horton, JK; Halle, JS; Chang, SX; Sartor, CI
Published in: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
January 1, 2006

PURPOSE: Whole breast radiotherapy (RT) followed by a tumor bed boost typically spans 5-6 weeks of treatment. Interest is growing in RT regimens, such as concomitant boost, that decrease overall treatment time, lessening the time/cost burden to patients and facilities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography (CT) scans from 20 cases were selected for this retrospective, dosimetric study to compare three different techniques of concomitant boost delivery: (1) standard tangents plus an electron boost, (2) intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) tangents using custom compensators plus an electron boost, and (3) IMRT tangents plus a conformal photon boost. The equivalent uniform dose model was used to compare the plans. RESULTS: The average breast equivalent uniform dose value for the three techniques (standard, IMRT plus electrons, and IMRT plus photons) was 48.6, 47.9, and 48.3, respectively. The plans using IMRT more closely approximated the prescribed dose of 46 Gy to the whole breast. The breast volume receiving >110% of the dose was less with the IMRT tangents than with standard RT (p = 0.037), but no significant difference in the maximal dose or other evaluated parameters was noted. CONCLUSION: Although the IMRT techniques delivered the prescribed dose with better dose uniformity, the small improvement seen did not support a goal of improved resource use.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

DOI

ISSN

0360-3016

Publication Date

January 1, 2006

Volume

64

Issue

1

Start / End Page

168 / 175

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Horton, J. K., Halle, J. S., Chang, S. X., & Sartor, C. I. (2006). Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 64(1), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.004
Horton, Janet K., Jan S. Halle, Sha X. Chang, and Carolyn I. Sartor. “Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64, no. 1 (January 1, 2006): 168–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.004.
Horton JK, Halle JS, Chang SX, Sartor CI. Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):168–75.
Horton, Janet K., et al. “Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 64, no. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 168–75. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.004.
Horton JK, Halle JS, Chang SX, Sartor CI. Comparison of three concomitant boost techniques for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):168–175.
Journal cover image

Published In

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

DOI

ISSN

0360-3016

Publication Date

January 1, 2006

Volume

64

Issue

1

Start / End Page

168 / 175

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic