Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Evaluation of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate Inside Canopies by Zero- and Level-Crossing Density Methods

Publication ,  Journal Article
Poggi, D; Katul, GG
Published in: Boundary-Layer Meteorology
May 17, 2010

Inferring the vertical variation of the mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate (ε) inside dense canopies remains a basic research problem to be confronted. Using detailed laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) measurements collected within a densely arrayed rod canopy, traditional and newly proposed methods to infer ε profiles are compared. The traditional methods for estimating ε at a given layer include isotropic relationships applied to the viscous dissipation scales that are resolved by LDA measurements, higher order structure function methods, and residuals of the turbulent kinetic energy budget in which production and transport terms are all independently inferred. The newly proposed method extends earlier approaches based on zero-crossing statistics, which were shown to be promising in a number of laboratory flows. The extension to account for an arbitrary threshold (hereafter referred to as the level-crossing method) instead of zero-crossing minimizes the effects of instrument noise on the inferred ε. While none of the ε methods employed here can be titled as 'measured', these methods differ in their underlying assumptions and simplifications. Above the canopy, where a balance between production and dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy is expected, the agreement among all the methods is reasonably good. In the lower-to-middle layers of the canopy, all the methods agree except for those based on a structure-function inference of ε. This departure can be attributed to the lack of a well-defined inertial subrange in these layers. In the upper canopy layers, the disagreements between the methods are largest. Even the higher order structure-function methods disagree with each other when ε is inferred from third- and fifth-order moments. However, for all layers within the canopy, the proposed zero- and threshold-crossing methods agree well with estimates of ε derived from the isotropic relationship applied to the viscous dissipation range. Finally, the advantages of introducing thresholds to minimize two types of instrument noises, additive and multiplicative, are briefly discussed. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

DOI

ISSN

0006-8314

Publication Date

May 17, 2010

Volume

136

Issue

2

Start / End Page

219 / 233

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
  • 3701 Atmospheric sciences
  • 0401 Atmospheric Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Poggi, D., & Katul, G. G. (2010). Evaluation of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate Inside Canopies by Zero- and Level-Crossing Density Methods. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 136(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9503-2
Poggi, D., and G. G. Katul. “Evaluation of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate Inside Canopies by Zero- and Level-Crossing Density Methods.” Boundary-Layer Meteorology 136, no. 2 (May 17, 2010): 219–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9503-2.
Poggi, D., and G. G. Katul. “Evaluation of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate Inside Canopies by Zero- and Level-Crossing Density Methods.” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 136, no. 2, May 2010, pp. 219–33. Scopus, doi:10.1007/s10546-010-9503-2.
Journal cover image

Published In

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

DOI

ISSN

0006-8314

Publication Date

May 17, 2010

Volume

136

Issue

2

Start / End Page

219 / 233

Related Subject Headings

  • Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
  • 3701 Atmospheric sciences
  • 0401 Atmospheric Sciences