Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Faulknier, BA; Traub, DM; Aktas, MK; Aguila, A; Rosero, S; Daubert, JP; Hall, B; Shah, A; Taylor, S; McNitt, S; Moss, AJ; Zareba, W; Huang, DT
Published in: Am J Cardiol
January 1, 2010

The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis leads (models 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949) are 6.6-F bipolar high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrodes that were first introduced in September 2004. In October 2007, Fidelis leads were removed from the market. We sought to determine the time-dependent hazard of the Fidelis failure rate to date. A retrospective chart review was conducted in all patients who underwent implantation of a Sprint Fidelis lead (426 leads) at our center. We primarily implanted models 6931 and 6949. With 1,056 years of combined follow-up (average 2.3 +/- 1), 38 of 426 (8.92%) Sprint Fidelis leads failed (3.6%/year). The hazard of fracture increased exponentially over time by a power of 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98 to 2.27, p <0.001) and the 3-year survival was 90.8% (95% CI 87.4 to 94.3). If a Fidelis lead was functioning normally at 1 year, the chance it would survive another year was 97.4% (95% CI 95.7 to 99.1); if functioning at 2 years, the chance of surviving another year was 94.7% (95% CI 91.8 to 97.7); and if functioning at 3 years, the chance of surviving 1 more year was 86.7% (95% CI 78.8 to 95.5). Other commonly used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads showed no evidence of increased failure rates. In conclusion, to date, the hazard of Fidelis lead fracture is increasing exponentially with time and, based on our data, occurring at a higher rate than the latest manufacturer's performance update. Further accumulative data are needed because it remains unknown if the fracture rate will level off or continue to increase.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am J Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1913

Publication Date

January 1, 2010

Volume

105

Issue

1

Start / End Page

95 / 99

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • United States
  • Time Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Faulknier, B. A., Traub, D. M., Aktas, M. K., Aguila, A., Rosero, S., Daubert, J. P., … Huang, D. T. (2010). Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure. Am J Cardiol, 105(1), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.655
Faulknier, Brett A., Darren M. Traub, Mehmet K. Aktas, Alian Aguila, Spencer Rosero, James P. Daubert, Burr Hall, et al. “Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure.Am J Cardiol 105, no. 1 (January 1, 2010): 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.655.
Faulknier BA, Traub DM, Aktas MK, Aguila A, Rosero S, Daubert JP, et al. Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jan 1;105(1):95–9.
Faulknier, Brett A., et al. “Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure.Am J Cardiol, vol. 105, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 95–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.655.
Faulknier BA, Traub DM, Aktas MK, Aguila A, Rosero S, Daubert JP, Hall B, Shah A, Taylor S, McNitt S, Moss AJ, Zareba W, Huang DT. Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jan 1;105(1):95–99.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1913

Publication Date

January 1, 2010

Volume

105

Issue

1

Start / End Page

95 / 99

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • United States
  • Time Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies