Skip to main content

Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Eckstein, F; Buck, RJ; Burstein, D; Charles, HC; Crim, J; Hudelmaier, M; Hunter, DJ; Hutchins, G; Jackson, C; Kraus, VB; Lane, NE; Link, TM ...
Published in: Ann Rheum Dis
December 2008

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) of cartilage morphology is a promising tool for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) development. Recent studies at single sites have indicated that measurements at 3.0 Tesla (T) are more reproducible (precise) than those at 1.5 T. Precision errors and stability in multicentre studies with imaging equipment from various vendors have, however, not yet been evaluated. METHODS: A total of 158 female participants (97 Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 0, 31 KLG 2 and 30 KLG 3) were imaged at 7 clinical centres using Siemens Magnetom Trio and GE Signa Excite magnets. Double oblique coronal acquisitions were obtained at baseline and at 3 months, using water excitation spoiled gradient echo sequences (1.0x0.31x0.31 mm3 resolution). Segmentation of femorotibial cartilage morphology was performed using proprietary software (Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany). RESULTS: The precision error (root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS CV)%) for cartilage thickness/volume measurements ranged from 2.1%/2.4% (medial tibia) to 2.9%/3.3% (lateral weight-bearing femoral condyle) across all participants. No significant differences in precision errors were observed between KLGs, imaging sites, or scanner manufacturers/types. Mean differences between baseline and 3 months ranged from <0.1% (non-significant) in the medial to 0.94% (p<0.01) in the lateral femorotibial compartment, and were 0.33% (p<0.02) for the total femorotibial subchondral bone area. CONCLUSIONS: qMRI performed at 3.0 T provides highly reproducible measurements of cartilage morphology in multicentre clinical trials with equipment from different vendors. The technology thus appears sufficiently robust to be recommended for large-scale multicentre trials.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Ann Rheum Dis

DOI

EISSN

1468-2060

Publication Date

December 2008

Volume

67

Issue

12

Start / End Page

1683 / 1688

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Middle Aged
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Knee Joint
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Eckstein, F., Buck, R. J., Burstein, D., Charles, H. C., Crim, J., Hudelmaier, M., … A9001140 Study Group, . (2008). Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis, 67(12), 1683–1688. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.076919
Eckstein, F., R. J. Buck, D. Burstein, H. C. Charles, J. Crim, M. Hudelmaier, D. J. Hunter, et al. “Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.Ann Rheum Dis 67, no. 12 (December 2008): 1683–88. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.076919.
Eckstein F, Buck RJ, Burstein D, Charles HC, Crim J, Hudelmaier M, et al. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Dec;67(12):1683–8.
Eckstein, F., et al. “Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.Ann Rheum Dis, vol. 67, no. 12, Dec. 2008, pp. 1683–88. Pubmed, doi:10.1136/ard.2007.076919.
Eckstein F, Buck RJ, Burstein D, Charles HC, Crim J, Hudelmaier M, Hunter DJ, Hutchins G, Jackson C, Kraus VB, Lane NE, Link TM, Majumdar LS, Mazzuca S, Prasad PV, Schnitzer TJ, Taljanovic MS, Vaz A, Wyman B, Le Graverand M-PH, A9001140 Study Group. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Dec;67(12):1683–1688.

Published In

Ann Rheum Dis

DOI

EISSN

1468-2060

Publication Date

December 2008

Volume

67

Issue

12

Start / End Page

1683 / 1688

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Middle Aged
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Knee Joint
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female