Skip to main content

Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kiehart, DP; Mabuchi, I; Inoué, S
Published in: The Journal of cell biology
July 1982

Antibody against cytoplasmic myosin, when microinjected into actively dividing cells, provides a physiological test for the role of actin and myosin in chromosome movement. Anti-Asterias egg myosin, characterized by Mabuchi and Okuno (1977, J. Cell Biol., 74:251), completely and specifically inhibits the actin activated Mg++ -ATPase of myosin in vitro and, when microinjected, inhibits cytokinesis in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that microinjected antibody has no observable effect on the rate or extent of anaphase chromosome movements. Neither central spindle elongation nor chromosomal fiber shortening is affected by doses up to eightfold higher than those require to uniformly inhibit cytokinesis in all injected cells. We calculate that such doses are sufficient to completely inhibit myosin ATPase activity in these cells. Cells injected with buffer alone, with myosin-absorbed antibody, or with nonimmune gamma-globulin, proceed normally through both mitosis and cytokinesis. Control gamma-globulin, labeled with fluorescein, diffuses to homogeneity throughout the cytoplasm in 2-4 min and remains uniformly distributed. Antibody is not excluded from the spindle region. Prometaphase chromosome movements, fertilization, pronuclear migration, and pronuclear fusion are also unaffected by microinjected antimyosin. These experiments demonstrate that antimyosin blocks the actomyosin interaction thought to be responsible for force production in cytokinesis but has no effect on mitotic or meiotic chromosome motion. They provide direct physiological evidence that myosin is not involved in force production for chromosome movement.

Duke Scholars

Published In

The Journal of cell biology

DOI

EISSN

1540-8140

ISSN

0021-9525

Publication Date

July 1982

Volume

94

Issue

1

Start / End Page

165 / 178

Related Subject Headings

  • gamma-Globulins
  • Starfish
  • Myosins
  • Mitosis
  • Meiosis
  • Fertilization
  • Developmental Biology
  • Cleavage Stage, Ovum
  • Chromosomes
  • Cell Nucleus
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kiehart, D. P., Mabuchi, I., & Inoué, S. (1982). Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement. The Journal of Cell Biology, 94(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.94.1.165
Kiehart, D. P., I. Mabuchi, and S. Inoué. “Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement.The Journal of Cell Biology 94, no. 1 (July 1982): 165–78. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.94.1.165.
Kiehart DP, Mabuchi I, Inoué S. Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement. The Journal of cell biology. 1982 Jul;94(1):165–78.
Kiehart, D. P., et al. “Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement.The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 94, no. 1, July 1982, pp. 165–78. Epmc, doi:10.1083/jcb.94.1.165.
Kiehart DP, Mabuchi I, Inoué S. Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement. The Journal of cell biology. 1982 Jul;94(1):165–178.

Published In

The Journal of cell biology

DOI

EISSN

1540-8140

ISSN

0021-9525

Publication Date

July 1982

Volume

94

Issue

1

Start / End Page

165 / 178

Related Subject Headings

  • gamma-Globulins
  • Starfish
  • Myosins
  • Mitosis
  • Meiosis
  • Fertilization
  • Developmental Biology
  • Cleavage Stage, Ovum
  • Chromosomes
  • Cell Nucleus