Skip to main content

Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: the effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Conklin, CA; Robin, N; Perkins, KA; Salkeld, RP; McClernon, FJ
Published in: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol
June 2008

Smokers are highly reactive to smoking-related cues that are directly linked, or most proximal, to actual smoking behavior (e.g., lit cigarettes). However, over the course of smoking, proximal cues may not be the only stimuli to become strongly associated with smoking. Distal cues, such as the environments in which smoking occurs (e.g., bar) might also gain associative properties and come to evoke robust reactivity from smokers. To test this, a pilot study was first conducted to develop standard pictorial stimuli of smoking and nonsmoking environments, all of which were completely devoid of proximal smoking cues. A comparison set of smoking and nonsmoking proximal cues was then created. Using the 12 total pictorial cues developed, 62 adult smokers participated in a cue-reactivity study during which they viewed and rated pictorial smoking and nonsmoking environment and proximal cues. Results demonstrate that, similar to proximal cues, environments associated with smoking can alone function as stimuli capable of evoking strong subjective reactivity from smokers. This work supports a broader conceptualization of drug-related cues in cue-based research and treatment development that includes proximal and distal cues as distinct categories. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).

Duke Scholars

Published In

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol

DOI

ISSN

1064-1297

Publication Date

June 2008

Volume

16

Issue

3

Start / End Page

207 / 214

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Substance Abuse
  • Smoking
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Motivation
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Environment
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Cues
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Conklin, C. A., Robin, N., Perkins, K. A., Salkeld, R. P., & McClernon, F. J. (2008). Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: the effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 16(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.207
Conklin, Cynthia A., Nathalie Robin, Kenneth A. Perkins, Ronald P. Salkeld, and F Joseph McClernon. “Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: the effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity.Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 16, no. 3 (June 2008): 207–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.207.
Conklin CA, Robin N, Perkins KA, Salkeld RP, McClernon FJ. Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: the effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;16(3):207–14.
Conklin, Cynthia A., et al. “Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: the effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity.Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, vol. 16, no. 3, June 2008, pp. 207–14. Pubmed, doi:10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.207.
Conklin CA, Robin N, Perkins KA, Salkeld RP, McClernon FJ. Proximal versus distal cues to smoke: the effects of environments on smokers' cue-reactivity. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;16(3):207–214.

Published In

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol

DOI

ISSN

1064-1297

Publication Date

June 2008

Volume

16

Issue

3

Start / End Page

207 / 214

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Substance Abuse
  • Smoking
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Motivation
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Environment
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Cues