Reduced selective constraint in endosymbionts: elevation in radical amino acid replacements occurs genome-wide.

As predicted by the nearly neutral model of evolution, numerous studies have shown that reduced N(e) accelerates the accumulation of slightly deleterious changes under genetic drift. While such studies have mostly focused on eukaryotes, bacteria also offer excellent models to explore the effects of N(e). Most notably, the genomes of host-dependent bacteria with small N(e) show signatures of genetic drift, including elevated K(a)/K(s). Here, I explore the utility of an alternative measure of selective constraint: the per-site rate of radical and conservative amino acid substitutions (D(r)/D(c)). I test the hypothesis that purifying selection against radical amino acid changes is less effective in two insect endosymbiont groups (Blochmannia of ants and Buchnera of aphids), compared to related gamma-Proteobacteria. Genome comparisons demonstrate a significant elevation in D(r)/D(c) in endosymbionts that affects the majority (66-79%) of shared orthologs examined. The elevation of D(r)/D(c) in endosymbionts affects all functional categories examined. Simulations indicate that D(r)/D(c) estimates are sensitive to codon frequencies and mutational parameters; however, estimation biases occur in the opposite direction as the patterns observed in genome comparisons, thereby making the inference of elevated D(r)/D(c) more conservative. Increased D(r)/D(c) and other signatures of genome degradation in endosymbionts are consistent with strong effects of genetic drift in their small populations, as well as linkage to selected sites in these asexual bacteria. While relaxed selection against radical substitutions may contribute, genome-wide processes such as genetic drift and linkage best explain the pervasive elevation in D(r)/D(c) across diverse functional categories that include basic cellular processes. Although the current study focuses on a few bacterial lineages, it suggests D(r)/D(c) is a useful gauge of selective constraint and may provide a valuable alternative to K(a)/K(s) when high sequence divergences preclude estimates of K(s). Broader application of D(r)/D(c) will benefit from approaches less prone to estimation biases.

Duke Scholars

Author Jennifer Jo Wernegreen Environmental Sciences and Policy